Can you give an instance where someone was banned for simply having Republican views, rather than someone violating the TOS who merely happens to be Republican?
So if you search for "twitter bans conservative", get literally dozens of results, you can always claim they are banned for "violating the TOS", not for expressing their views. And since there's almost never a specification of what caused the ban and no process that allows to know it, and frequently not even any notification beyond "you've been suspended, goodbye" there's no way to resolve this question (e.g. twitter suspended one of my accounts which I used to post completely innocent non-political non-offensive jokes, I still have no idea why and there's no process to find out, I don't care because I stopped using Twitter shortly thereafter anyway).
So you can always claim this is because all these people were racist, hateful and doxxing. I have no means to prove otherwise to you, there's no force in the Universe, beyond God Almighty and maybe NSA, that could prove particular twitter account never posted anything bad, especially after it's been blocked. But I can see the pattern. Especially when obvious hateful conduct on twitter (like a notorious antisemite Farrakhan) keep using Twitter for spreading their hate without any problems.
Providing examples is a counter-argument.
Of course, next stage would be claiming it's all for "TOS violations" and "hateful conduct".
Please cite antifa accounts on Twitter - not blocked - that are inciting violence.
Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone.
> Partisan hand-waving doesn’t fool anyone.
That's ok, because there's no purpose to fool anyone. Only to highlight the obvious bias of certain social media platforms, which get triggered by slightest transgression by right wingers and at the same time tolerate virulent haters like Farrakhan and violent organizations like Antifa. These are the facts, you can interpret them as you like.