Not even a paragraph in and I see problems with this. Seems somebody bias has already gotten in their own way.
This is the first step - redefine the meanings of words to fit your agenda.
I could be wrong about the intent. But when you can redefine fairness the you can make it fair to take from one person and give to another. Or deny one person and Grant access to another based on things that don't matter.
Also. The attack on human bias is totally silly. It's a key trait that had made us and other species successful. Without these biases we might pick the wrong fruit eat it and die. We might try to cuddel into a cave with bears in the winter.
Our entire existence and reasoning skills is based off bases.
Also. Never in my life have a seen ripe or unripe bannans and described them by their color. Is this a education problem?
But even if I had there is nothing wrong with pointing out when something is not atypical. Besides if I plan on eating bananas in a few days I might want the "green" ones. Or if I was going to make a yummy smoothie the "brown" ones are the ones I want.
Also bananas are a bad analogy for what they were getting at. Every banana has the potential to be green, then yellow, then brown. So none of these states are out of the ordinary.
I don't need or want to be unconsciously retrained by ML. I think we are going to need laws against big cooperations using their power and tech to change socal constructs. It's not their place and we can never be sure they are doing it for good or even the outcome will be good for human kind. It's also a power that can be abused. We already have internal documents comming from Google suggesting swaying public opinion on on political canadates. And this type of research is exactly where you would start.