If a journalist dying influences someone's behavior but thousands dying in Yemen didn't do it I'd be curious to know why.
Everything is built off of norms and expectations. An example people have a little bettwr tendency to understand is that if a bunch of soldiers get shot in a war it's less of a big deal than if a bunch of people get shot in the suburbs because the soldiers getting shot is more normal and expected. Killing a journalist, especially a journalist working for a major US newspaper is hugely against international norms.
International norms are exactly the problem when you're talking about a country like Saudi Arabia. The normal thinking is, so long as they are a cooperative US ally, so long as they aren't communists, any kind of barbarism goes.
I think the norm in this scenario is, people pretend to be shocked that the regime that stones women to death also murders well-connected journalists, then we return to routine normality.
Because daily screaming in the media about one but not the other?
Unless there is an disproportionate amount of benefit I get from joining that company, then yes it would.
I don't know what moneys benefit from Saudi money, however.