In the US we are currently enjoying the government (at least in the executive) that the majority of people did not vote for.

As opposed to the government the majority of us people voted for previously which did so much better?

These problems apparently go well beyond political moniker and I find it confusing that anyone who has been paying attention feels voting for a different color talking politician is going to fix them.

> In the US, it would have been sufficient to vote for a different party. Enjoy the government, the majority of you people voted for.

Except in the lower house of the national legislature (where the dominant party is still significantly overrepresented compared to the popular vote for that body), the dominant party in the political branches of the US government was not supported by a majority of voters in election to each body, even if you only consider major party votes.

The other party wants to make revolt impossible by dismantling the 2nd Amendment. So it's a choice as to whether one wants slightly-better politics or much-better metapolitics.

The majority of Americans voted for Hillary.