Oof, that'll leave a mark.
Oof, that'll leave a mark.
Fast forward 15 years and everything he stood against, everything he mocked, he has now become a part of. The recent Sotheby's shredder stunt is only the most recent example. He took an expensive piece of his own art, and increased the value ten fold by doing what he did.
I used to love the guy, now he's just another money grubbing scum who can't seem to get enough of the spotlight.
You clearly have much more of a direct personal experience / knowledge of Banksy's history than I do, but I feel as though he's using the spotlight in order to make a point about how money-hungry the modern art world has become. Yes, you could take the cynical side and assume he really is just doing these 'exposure-stunts' as a way to make more money, but I'd like to believe he still stands for his anti-establishment message.
As an aside, I thought much of his art (especially vandalism) doesn't actually belong to him, and he doesn't see the proceeds.
Actually his pieces regularly go up for auction and rake in hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Here's a short list of just the most expensive ones to date:
https://www.widewalls.ch/10-most-expensive-banksy-artworks-a...
There's a pretty compelling theory that the original wasn't destroyed at all, that the frame is an old magic trick, you roll the painting out of view, and spit a torn up half out the bottom. Did you see the photo Banksy posted of the x-acto blades ? It really is rather nonsensical... [0]
Then again, maybe he's playing the long game once people figure out the whole charade is Banksy selling out, the price of his work crashes, thus restoring its purity as self-expression.
[0] https://www.boredpanda.com/banksy-painting-girl-with-balloon...
That’s the most interesting part about all this and the thing that makes me believe the Robert Del Naja theory.
I spent a lot of my life around people that are famous or trying to be, it’s an incredible drug. The fact that he’s able to resist it is notable.