Forgive my ignorance, but how do you know that what these tools show is good or bad at representing what you see?
Colour deficiencies vary, though, so even a simulation that works perfectly for some is not going to be a universal simulation.
These simulations are amazing in terms of illustrating to colour-capable people what we colour-deficient actually see: it's not black and white, to us the world is still bright, vivid, colourful. It's our normal and that mostly isn't a problem. But a bright red rose that's colourful and vivid to me, looks to my wife grey and faded.