What bothers me as someone who works with web standards is that these URL tracking services should have been fundamentally rejected as they're only used for tracking and completely unnecessary.
Additionally, they're not actually part of web technology due to Twitter's ToS...
I run a web crawling company (http://www.datastreamer.io/) and we license data to other companies based on what we crawl.
This really opens up some weird situations for us...
If a URL is copied and shared OUTSIDE of Twitter but behind a t.co URL you can't access it without agreeing to their ToS even though the link might be to the nytimes or some other service.
I was initially upset about the GDPR but I'm starting to see the light of day here.
You can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't both be on the Internet but then put up an insane ToS claiming you have rights that restrain Internet users.
It's like standing on the street corner and yelling and then saying everyone around you owes you royalties because they're hearing your copyrighted speech.