Serological response to H. pylori proteins linked to risk of colorectal cancer
gastrojournal.org
gastrojournal.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helicobacter_pylori
To test this controversial idea, Marshall self-administered the bacterium and developed an ulcer:
Unable to make his case in studies with lab mice (because H. pylori affects only primates) and prohibited from experimenting on people, Marshall grew desperate. Finally he ran an experiment on the only human patient he could ethically recruit: himself. He took some H. pylori from the gut of an ailing patient, stirred it into a broth, and drank it. As the days passed, he developed gastritis, the precursor to an ulcer: He started vomiting, his breath began to stink, and he felt sick and exhausted. Back in the lab, he biopsied his own gut, culturing H. pylori and proving unequivocally that bacteria were the underlying cause of ulcers.
http://discovermagazine.com/2010/mar/07-dr-drank-broth-gave-...
Somewhere between 1% and 22 % ( mean 11% ) increased risk of colorectal cancer in selected subpopulations.
In contrast, 50 grams of processed meat a day increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18%.
Sounds like someone is desperate to get a publication, and managed to slip one past gullible or equally desperate editors.
These confidence intervals don't exactly instill confidence... Oh and we cherry picked this subpopulation where the effect is all over the place with a bigger mean.
[1] http://www.cancer.ca/en/prevention-and-screening/reduce-canc...
Surprised by this. But Seems not to be the best of the germs. A nobel price was given due to the discovery of Helicobacter and ulcer disease:
https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/2005/press-releas...