Just because it produces revenue for a few ad tech companies doesn't make it objectively good. Marketing bs products to people through online ads is no different than giving crack to kids, presenting the idea of a major life solution through pretty fonts and flashy user flows when in fact most products are just stupid and ill-conceived from start to finish. If I left a tab after checking out a product and didn't buy it, it probably sucks. But repeatedly shoving it in someone's face through advertising after visits, for one concrete example, basically pushes people into situations they didn't consent to. It is total manipulation and its reprehensible - its just slightly more abstract and people get drawn into the "well just dont buy it!" narrative.
It is a fact that an increasingly large number of people have poor impulse control and pretending it doesn't is not equivalent to predatory activity being OK.
Got a link to this data?
I'm sure there's a good counter example to the notion of 'ad targeting is terrible', but this is not it. If one goes by this example, you'd need companies to know that you are an alcoholic in order to avoid advertising to them, which seems to be an extremely personal piece of data. Surely your point is not that this is an acceptable compromise in order to avoid alcoholics ever seeing an ad for alcohol?