We Cannot Avoid the Ugly Tradeoffs of Bail Reform
marginalrevolution.com
marginalrevolution.com
Why is setting a high bail amount better than not releasing people? They're meant to be functionally equivalent except when someone can somehow manage to scrounge a lot of cash together.
I am very curious what motivations judges have for returning to this system of unaffordable bonds though.
He doesn't really spell it out, but I could imagine non-cash release having issues with reappearance or reoffence, but if that's the case you want to dig into the details, not just hand wave about it.
I agree that it’s extremely weird that we do this song and dance where we misuse the bail system to lock up those judged to be a danger to society. We should just deny those people bail, and offer the rest a fair bail amount to encourage their return.
FWIW: I think the fact that bail reform is forcing judges to merely deny bail for dangerous cases is a good thing. Being more clear about what’s happening and why is a good thing, especially in the legal system.
I just don’t see evidence that cash bail is really the most pressing issue in the system atm. DA’s tipping off the media for perp walks, crooked cops, racist juries, and a slow and expensive system all take higher priority in my book.
not being able to bail out is more than a minor inconvenience.... people lose jobs, miss rent, get evicted and lose everything while being presumed innocent.