Founders care about their companies the way parents care about their kids.
I've seen this asymmetry cause some issues where founders don't get why their employees aren't as enveloped in the company as they are. A respectable salary and less than a percent of the stock doesn't get the same commitment as a founder does.
I'm certainly going to be following the path suggested by the OP. I've already been thinking about it for a while.
Me and a friend, both non-technical, started a service oriented company 6 years ago.
Now we're switching our focus to SaaS and even have some $$ to pay contractors / employees...
But how do we evaluate talent?
How do we delegate?
How do we understand (much less give input) on technical decisions?
What happens when (not if) they leave and move on?
Being vulnerable to and leaving that much decision-making responsibility to 'employees' who aren't invested like you are is a recipe for failure - entrepreneurs make things happen and get things done, but how much of that can you do if you don't understand the core of what your business does - software?
All of which already have high paying careers. They're young enough to defect, but only if they have a chance to make their mortgage payments.