It feels like the title abuses the word "garbage collector", which implies automatic and dynamic. That sounds like "Bike is a human-powered motorcycle".
However the article is well-written and very informative. Just need to skip the title :-)
However the article is well-written and very informative. Just need to skip the title :-)
"Better" here means more accurate and neutral, and preferably using representative language from the article.
Rust has a static "garbage collector"
It reflects Klabnick's thesis here, whereas the current "I don't find writing Rust to be significantly harder..." title is probably more controversial.It's hard for us to guess perfectly every time, but an imperfect guess is usually better than leaving a misleading or baity title up.
But, I also don't think this is a huge deal, given that it's no longer on the front page.