Ham vs. Ham as Radio Amateurs Are in Conflict with ARRL
perens.com
perens.com
I fear I may be too late for a vote at this time, but can't find where I would cast it on arrl.net in any case. Any advice?
https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?proceedings_name=RM-...
I don't think this accommodates spread spectrum very well. One might want to do something like CDMA, spread across the entire band but down in the noise level from the perspective of a traditional transmission.
I’m not particularly social so qso’s around the planet aren’t really interesting to me beyond the basic astonishment of how far 5 watts can go.
The ability to tx from a weather balloon at 20 miles up and having an emergency means to communicate are way higher on the list.
Also been wanting to play with some 70cm transceiver chips I got a while back off ebay but never really messed with.
What's the best place online to plug into what's going on in SDR?
You can also search on github for active projects, https://github.com/topics/sdr is a good place to start
I also like to browse https://www.sigidwiki.com/wiki/Signal_Identification_Guide to get ideas for signals to look for
I personally use both rtl-sdr and a HackRF One. The HackRF makers have some pretty good videos on their site https://greatscottgadgets.com/sdr/
I've built a few basic radios from scratch as well, and the only reason is because the SDR makes it cheap to test and interface with whatever I make. Radio shack may be gone, but any component you could dream of is only a few days away via amazon, etc.
Sadly none of this stuff with the ARRL is new. One ham activity is contests where hams compete to talk to as many people as they can in a weekend or over multiple weekends. There are clubs consisting of multiple members who compete for the prize of top club. In the early seventies they changed the rules so that you could be a member if you lived within 175 miles of the clubs location.
I helped formed a Midwest club, the Mad River Radio Club that was based in Ohio but had members in four states. We entered and won the competition. Then after the event was finished the ARRL rewrote the rules posthumously and all of a sudden we'd been disqualified.
(direct URL could break HN rules)
Failure to make their back issues available online seems like a genuine breach of faith with their authors over the years. I can only assume that if someone does upload them to archive.org, they'll send a DMCA takedown notice in a hurry.
Being out of amateur radio for so long:
1. I honestly don't even remember what my call sign was. Does anyone know if there is some way I can look that up? This was literally decades ago.
2. This may come across as a dumb question, but what is Ham radio primarily used for today? I mean, when I was a kid I remember being thrilled being able to talk to (or at least listen in on) conversations from around the globe. This was all in pre-internet days, nevermind pre-chatroom and social network days. What is ham radio's "niche" now that the internet has taken over the world?
3. Does anyone use Morse code anymore?
4. What are the new "hybrid operating modes" that exist?
Thanks!
2. Hobby and EmCom. When I lived in Texas most of the clubs were HF contest based. Now I’m in the PNW and lots of the clubs are EmCom based which is interesting. Lots of neat operating modes just in Tech class. APRS, Satellite, Ham mesh networking.
3. Yes. If you want DX CW is a great way to do it.
4. Digital modes provide some new and interesting stuff these days. Using FT8 mode I can hit Japan, China, and Australia on 10-30watts.
I think radio is a great hobby. Bit expensive but still very relevant. I’ve learned a ton by practical application.
1. If it hasn’t expired, the FCC callsign lookup should tell you
2. There have been developments into digital modes, as well as growth in DMR and DX competitions. But as a licensed amateur myself, I’m actually not sure what most people who get licensed these days do
3. Yep, some of the CW frequencies are fairly busy, given you can get some crazy range. And kits like the QRP labs QCX is $40-odd
4. No idea, I had a quick google and it didn’t become any more apparent, sorry!
2. many things. i like radiosport competitions. there are many sub-hobbies. experimenting with high coding-gain codes is also interesting.
3. yes. i use it for radiosport. go listen at the low end of 40m right now for the California QSO Party. many dits. (asking if morse code is still used by anybody is like asking if people still use sailboats. yes, but not for commercial purposes. )
2. For me, three things. There are a variety of low-earth orbiting satellites that can be accessed with nothing but a Baofeng and a yagi built with some Romex copper elements, glue, and balsa wood (Google AMSAT FM). There's something awe-inspiring to me being able to talk to people contient wide with just a few watts and < $50s of walkie-talkie gear. Second, even though it's been possible since the 50's, it's still a rush to talk to people across the US or world over shortwave with just a long wire thrown up in the tree. I got started with the http://www.elecraft.com/KX2/kx2.htm although there are certainly more affordable entry paths. Some spare Ethernet cable, the ugly balum http://www.hamuniverse.com/balun.html and a few trees make a surprisngly effective means of communicating on 40 meters without that much power. Third, although ubiquitos cell service has lessend the usefulness, the distributed nature of being able to transmit your position and exchange txt messages with people around the world via APRS https://aprs.fi/ is still amazing to me.
But a vote for new leadership is one way of supporting the ARRL, and a far better decision than simply cancelling one's membership.
I know most of the signatories of the letter and they are all bright and thoughtful people. It's also cool to have Perens involved, since he's a celebrity outside amateur radio. I believe he has a quad antenna visible on his rooftop in the Berkeley hills.
Perens has http://perens.com/static/ARRL/TransparencyOctober2018.html about new people for five director slots. Going through them, I first see that the Valerie Hotzfeld website is "very worried" about 160,000 members versus 170,000. Seems like a minor concern to me.
The Ria Jairam website says she'll oppose any proposal to the FCC unless there's open debate by membership. I believe that the correct ARRL position, when the FCC may be considering a change relevant to my two issues, is sometimes COMPLETELY OBVIOUS and what we actually need is the fastest possible action by ARRL.
The Fred Hopengarten website mentions "A low cost basic membership: one idea - no QSL bureau (inbound or outbound)." But inbound QSLs (see the https://www.arrl.org/incoming-qsl-service page) don't require membership at all! I'm not sure why a prospective member would pay a "low cost" to reduce their current service level.
The Michael Ritz website talks about "addition of Kosovo, Z6, to the DXCC Approved Country list." Hello? I'm a maker, not an international diplomat.
The George Hippisley website has a tantalizing mention of "Frequency Spectrum" at http://www.w2ru.net/whatFrequencySpectrum.html - but it's BLANK!
Five candidates' websites, and I can't find any discussion of what I need from ARRL. And yet, my incumbent director, who apparently has no website at all, has a mailed statement to our entire division saying he'll emphasize my two issues.
This whole thing strikes me as sloppy politics that eventually led to pointless infighting...
The other side of the hobby I dislike is the proliferation of proprietary protocols, but that's another topic altogether.