Hacker News Reader

Ah, ok, yeah that wasn't clear to me from the articles I saw, it sounded like desktop sharing. I went to the BigScreen talk at Oculus Connect and yeah it's pretty clear that their focus at the moment is on people watching video content together in VR but we have used it with some success for code reviews (desktop sharing is key there, I can jump between Visual Studio and the Unity Editor).

Your keyboard sounds interesting and I'll have to check it out but to be honest it's not a big selling point for me as a touch typist: I don't have any trouble using my keyboard in VR. We do have some non touch typists on the team though and it's not always convenient to put your Touch controllers down to type so I can see it being useful.

My ideal VR collaboration app would support at least solid desktop sharing support, well implemented VR whiteboards (including annotation on the shared desktop) and 3D sketching like Quill / Tilt Brush. We use whiteboards and 3D sketching in Rec Room but they're quite primitive. The sketching doesn't have to match a dedicated sketching app but should be better than Rec Room.

It would also be useful to be able to easily import 3D assets for review, Dash support for GLTF is looking like a good implementation of that. Custom environments would also be useful for us so we could do collaborative design of environments for our own VR app.

You should give Hubs a try, it's a WebVR based collaboration and communication tool we're working on at Mozilla. Screen sharing is behind a feature flag (and not quite working atm) but you can bring in GLTF models, images, and do simple 3d drawing. Also, by being the browser, it avoids a lot of the installation and coordination steps of native apps, and works on phone and PC.

https://hubs.mozilla.com

I was actually at that session as well! It was a bit surprising for me to hear that they're taking such a strong stance with regards to shared movie watching, but generally it's always felt that Bigscreen has been tuned for gamers / entertainment type use cases.

Totally hear you with regards to being comfortable touch typing while in VR, but I think that this is a pretty big barrier for a lot of users that are not as comfortable in VR. In our early experiences demoing Dream to people, we noticed just how overwhelming going into VR is for a lot of people that have had either no exposure, or very little to it. We used to have computer keyboard pass-thru, and this could be something that we add back as we continue to iterate and make the experience better.

In terms of desktop sharing - we used to have this capability, and it's still in the build but disabled. We pulled it back due to some inherent usability issues that we're working on as well as performance limits on low-end machines.

Annotation (whiteboarding on shared content or a white screen) is next up on our road map, we just didn't have sufficient time to get it into the initial release - so excited to hear that's something you would be looking for. Similarly, 3D model import / review is something that we're about to tackle as well. One of the big things we're excited about exploring is actually using chromium to do this vs. forcing every client to download what could be a big file, or push performance limitations on a varied set of machines. Instead, we'd find a way to utilize WebRTC to stream the content in a way that provides a 3D review experience for all clients with no performance limit.

On environments, we agree as well - right now we have one environment, and have 2 others in the pipeline. In the future, it'd be great to allow for 360 stereo videos to be used as the environment or allow teams to customize their environments if they've got the in house capabilities to do so!

Thanks for the feedback, and hope you get a chance to try Dream out a bit and give us some hands on experience if you get a minute a well!

I've always thought that conferences / education / seminars was the big sell here. Productivity didn't seem like a starter, simply because work is such a cultural thing with all of its own stresses and getting people to adopt these new techniques is like pulling teeth. Students and conference goers who want to save on the extremely big bucks that travel and classrooms and conference halls can cost will see this as a huge win.

Also, the isolated / focused environment of VR could be a big plus for learning as it blocks out so many distractions. I'd love to see a study done around that.

I'm also extremely excited about education applications for VR, especially those that benefit from real time communication. For example, learning a foreign language from a tutor that lives in the origin country of that language - and being able to interact with them naturally, including the various nonverbal cues that are crucial when learning a new language in the same location as someone that has it mastered.

At a slightly higher level, I think VR can unlock a lot of "centralization of expertise" type use cases. Basically, there's some resource that is distributed normally but is required to be centralized due to the way that expertise is consumed. For example, things like call centers, or tutoring - if those people could instead operate from wherever they might be located while providing their expertise to customers wherever they may be located, this could be super useful for both providers of said expertise as well as the consumers of it.

Definitely excited to see what kind of things applications like Dream can enable!

Great work on this. I lead a remote team, and if the vision here were fully realized and available on the Oculus Go/Quest, I’d trade some travel budget to equip the entire team with it.

You asked what features it would need. My use cases are basically what we do when we bring the team to one location for face-to-face work. While there are use-cases for typical distributed work, there aren’t many things we can’t do with the tools available: Slack, Google Docs, email, git, etc.

What is missing that only VR can solve?

Generally:

Space. No matter how many monitors we place on our desk, we run out of real-estate quickly. Collaborate planning and problem solving often requires space to visualize our thoughts and ideas.

Social presence. When human problems overshadow technical problems (i.e., all the time), the feeling of being fully present to one another is necessary.

Specifically:

A whiteboard. In VR, you could make something far better than the 10k devices out on the market today (I’m making this number up, since “request a demo” is the standard price)

Emotionally engaging avatars. Seeing a head turn isn’t enough. We need to be able to see another person’s unique facial expressions in order to connect. With goggles covering half the face, I don’t know this is possible, but ML research in 3D facial reconstruction from 2D photos has shown a lot of promise. Perhaps in-painting combined with reconstruction would do the trick.

Beyond these two items, I see a large space for reimagining UI in VR. Unlike a monitor and mouse, VR knows generally where you are looking, and in the case of Oculus, what you are saying. Voice commands that are contextual to eye gaze (tracking would be better) could be combined with VR’s version of a right-click context-menu as an HUD. It doesn’t need to be as crazy as Iron Man, but given a limited number of options, voice commands seem an ideal fit for VR.

A few years ago, I prototyped a HUD/Voice UI as the central feature in a VR browser, but I found resolution on my DK2 to be too limiting. Maybe the time is right to try again. I’d love to see someone try!

Thanks for the kind words! We are totally on board in terms of getting Dream on to the upcoming Quest, and standalone VR headsets in general. We've had a bit of success in getting businesses to install VR set ups in a conference room, but when this stuff is a $400 standalone device that doesn't cannibalize your work computer or phone I think it completely changes the viability of using VR for productivity / collab (especially on the go).

Thanks for the feedback on what kind of stuff you'd like to see! Deeply agree on the whiteboard thing, and it's one of the next features we want to tackle on our road map. In particular, we're excited about the ability to annotate either a white screen (normal whiteboard) or content that is being shared. The sensitivity of the controllers plays a big part here, but even for something like marking up a presentation or document this could go a long long way.

I agree that VR headsets have a bit of ways to go in terms of detecting facial gestures and emotions. I've seen some really cool tech using putting galvanic response sensors in the facemask, which could do everything from detect overall eye direction (up down etc) as well as emoji level gesture detection. I think over time, these features will become standard in most HMDs. In the meantime, we tried to balance the line between uncanny / creepy to useful and engaging. Perhaps it doesn't come through as well in the video, but when you're in VR just the head motion / hand position goes a long long way. Also, we built our entire stack to ensure that we're able to send this data as quickly as we get it from the HW - and keep our latency down, this provides for a surprisingly engaging experience and would love to hear what you think if you get to try it sometime!

We are keen to explore the addition of voice and contextual gaze based actions. We had a bit of this built before launch, but for the feature set we launched with didn't really use much of it. With regards to voice, we are planning to integrate with something like Google Voice Engine but wanted to make sure we had a good text entry method for things voice has a really hard time with like URLs, passwords and usernames - these were in the critical user flow, since they're required for logging in / creating accounts as well as selecting what kind of content to share. We also added Dropbox / Google Drive integrations to make bringing in content more fluid and intuitive, so overall you can kind of see where we've been prioritizing but we definitely have a long ways to go and more to build!

I gave it a quick try, some initial observations:

- You don't appear to be using SDK layers for your screens, they would probably help with text readability.

- UI isn't very discoverable and I couldn't find help.

- I couldn't find a way to zoom / scale a web view, this would help with text readability on a site like HN if I could set the zoom to say 150%.

- Related but different, I couldn't find a way to move / scale a panel.

- I couldn't find a way to rotate my view and I spawned at an awkward angle so had to stand at an angle to my cameras to face the large screen. I'd normally expect to find snap turn on the thumbstick in most apps.

- The keyboard works quite well, nice job. I feel like a Swype style keyboard could work even better for VR though.

- Keyboard behavior was a bit unintuitive on sign up, I tried to touch the next input field to select it and my keyboard disappeared, I didn't immediately notice the next / previous buttons on the keyboard itself.

- There's not a lot to do initially as a lone user. Some kind of onboarding / tutorial would be good and it would give a better initial impression if there was a bit more to do. I know the focus is on collaboration but I think you would benefit from a hook for individual users trying it out.

Hey! I'm Doug, one of the founders of Dream.

Thanks for taking the time to leave detailed feedback like this. We need as much of it as we can get.

A few of your points come down to discoverability / help. You are correct. We agree that before the app comes out of early access we have to drastically increase that. Once we understand that the core functionality is serving its intended purpose, we will turn our attention to onboarding, help and discoverability.

It's also fair to point out that pixel density in the headsets aren't really great yet. We are of the opinion that legibility will be a problem that solves itself in the near future. User frustration might force us to reconsider that opinion sooner rather than later.

Lastly, with regard to the position of UI, it is something we have worked on quite a bit and there is still plenty of room for it to get better. We have shied away from infinitely adjustable UI size and positioning and instead tried to make something that positions itself automatically. Right now, the UI positions itself based on where your head and hands are and how long we think your arms are. The implementation is pretty naive and we intend to improve it over time. This might be another area where we have to get more mechanical to decrease frustration.

Yeah, headset resolution is limited but that's why it's important to make the most of what you have. As I understand it the SDK quad and cylinder layers bypass the lens distortion pass and effectively analytically ray trace the optimal sample point for direct display. Carmack is always telling people to use them for anything text heavy. I haven't done a side by side comparison but this is probably why Dash text is a bit more legible than yours. Future headsets will have higher resolution but we're years away from high enough for this stuff not to matter.

As an experienced VR user my expectation at this point is that I can move panels around with my hands and ideally scale them too. Doing that well and in a way that doesn't trip up novice users isn't trivial though, Dash still has some work to do there.

I don't mean to be overly critical, my first VR app (for the DK2!) was written from scratch in C++ so I know how much work goes into developing something like this without an engine. I want this type of app to succeed so I can use it though so the feedback is intended to be constructive!

I don't take this as overly critical. We need and welcome feedback.

Looking at layers for text is something we will definitely do. We are happy with SDF text in our UI, but text inside of Chromium is miles from acceptable and will continue to be a focus.

As far as scalable and user positional UI, we currently hold the opinion that it doesn't offer enough value to compensate for the complication that it introduces, especially for novice users. At the same time, we realize that is a contrarian point of view and user frustration may force us to change it. We have to remain open to changing opinions like these.

Agree with Doug's response, but wanted to quickly say thanks for pointing us at the SDK layers thing - will dig into it!

We spent a fair bit of time building out this pretty unique node-based pipeline architecture, where the HMD is effectively just a sink node. We made an attempt to make text / content more legible by the way of an FXAA implementation, which would have limited performance impact as compared to something like MSAA - but it definitely can get a lot better. Will dig into that stuff, and hopefully we can improve it further!