Indeed there is nothing wrong with any concept. If they wanted to show some systemic bias they should also publish a study about how to train women like dogs to attack men.
> Reject studies that have implausible findings?
Yes (if by implausible you mean unconvincing). Reject and resubmit with more powerful statistics.
> or publish it and let people follow up and do their own studies
Indeed , like good software, you publish a barely functioning version and let others find the bugs /s
> authors are welcome to suggest anything that like as a result of their research
Not really, editors will often tone you down. Otherwise we might do away with peer and editorial review.
I think you are advocating for 'anything goes' publishing here. Sure but then these journals should not call themselves scientific, it's a travesty to co-opt that name to validate their existence. Which in the end proves the point the author makes.
The author clearly has an agenda here, that's why they re publishing a blog, not a "science journal"