I'm not sure where the misunderstanding is.
The article is about censoring economic news.
The top comment suggests an example of economic news that is censored.
Anyone reading the comments would assume that the example news is indeed censored.
However, that was not the case, as shown in the links I provided. (If they were censored, the pages would have been taken down retrospectively)
I'm pointing out that example is a false accusation of the content being censored.