If this continues to be the response to a reasoned talk about gender differences, I fear trump-like characters will continue to gain ground.
arguments should be fought with better arguments.
arguments should be fought with better arguments.
I find it surprising that you can follow up a comment that has no substance beyond invoking a vague emotional response with this.
If you think arguments are the way for constructive discourse, perhaps you ought to present some arguments yourself.
I suspect the suspension is a desperate attempt at trying to contain PR damage to the organization.
You think that better arguments are going to convince people with this kind of reasoning?
Loads of people all over the place are just wrong. It happens all the time. And there isn't a moral obligation to respond to some wrong opinion over and over again.
People who think we need to have rational debates with flat earthers are not people who will be convinced by much. They are the 20% of people who think Bigfoot are real.