Commuting by Bicycle is down?
davemabe.com
davemabe.com
My commute in San Francisco involves crossing 16 streets. It's not very far, about 2.5 miles.
On Friday I observed 35 cars run red lights--not even "it's yellow and time to speed up because drivers don't give a single flying crap about safety" but literally the cross traffic lane is green.
Cars are a terrible unsustainable mess, ruining the environment and ruining city livability. It's not surprising that the risks they impose on the rest of the world are resulting in less people willing to bike
My daughter is 1. By the time she starts school I want her to be able to ride a bike to school without dying.
[0]: https://www.pri.org/stories/2015-07-18/survey-finds-bicyclis... [1]: https://usa.streetsblog.org/2017/03/16/busting-the-myth-of-t... [2]: https://jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/871/875
The question is: shouldn't one of those vehicles be held to a higher standard?
If I had to guess, I'd say that I've seen at most 35 cars run red-lights in the last year.
Am I just not noticing them? Are we counting "running a red-light" differently? I'm having a hard time figuring out why our numbers are so different.
Due to the number of aggressively awful drivers in the city, I've ordered a dashcam for my bike, so I'll likely have some footage to demonstrate this soon. (Well, I hope not, but.)
American cities are so unpleasant to exist in on the ground level people prefer the safety of their smog machines at all times, even if you are going half a mile down the road for a carton of milk.
Everything is designed to funnel you out of the city into your extremely inefficient suburb so you can stop by taco-bell and wal-mart on your 50 minute commute home.
But hey, the answer is more roads right? Not incentivizing people to have less roads on the highway?
Conversely, I love cycling. I've been a bike mechanic, and my wife and I ride mountain bikes all the time. to me, it's just not worth going out on the street. The mindset is somewhat like, "if I'm going to get hurt cycling, it might as well be fun, and my own fault".
One point that you miss, at least in SF, is the considerable expense of having your bike stolen all the time. friends that commute either bring their bike into a dedicate secure area for work, or expect to have parts/the whole thing stolen. I used to cycle to the gym on a beater bike in a low traffic area, and when that beater bike got stolen, I gave up on any cycle commuting for anything.
I don't understand these as a dane. Almost all that commutes by bike goes without showers when they arrive. Just ride a little slower. Also why would it take longer to leave? Taking on a pair of rain pants is about 40s.
It is unappealing to ride in the winter though, nothing is going to change that.
Portland is not a very dense city except in a small number of residential blocks in and around downtown. There are many neighborhoods of mostly single-family (or small apartment complexes) in the <10 mile distance which accounts for the majority of bike commuters in my experience.
The source is not in English: www.modelcenter.transport.dtu.dk/-/media/Centre/Modelcenter/2017-Faktaark_cykeltrafik_180523.ashx?la=da
My suspicion is that a part of the drop is due to the slow shift away from suburbs. Bike commuting from a suburb can be great (I've been a year-round commuter for over half a decade). However, the exurbs are too far away for bicycles, and inside urban areas you often have lots of other choices for getting to the office.
That said - the car is not necessarily faster than biking, especially in the city. Anecdotal example: I live about 1.5 miles from my workplace. Biking is about twice as fast as driving during rush hour because of traffic. So I bike!
Congratulations on arranging your life well, though. I think back fondly to the times I was 2-4 miles from work. Actually for about six months I was a few blocks away. That was great.
Biking looks time consuming, but if you use it as time for exercise and sunshine-time you would otherwise be doing on your free time, it's almost 0 marginal cost.
Thankfully, my commute is short and summers aren't too hot, so I don't yet need to add an additional 10-15 minutes for showering after arriving.
However, on the bike I can average nearly 15 miles an hour, so I actually save time! In all fairness that time is more than eaten up by the additional steps (don bike gear, load bike, etc.) but it's nearly a wash.
That a broad generalization based only on your specific experience.
Chicago, for example, continues to build bicycle lanes separated by concrete medians, bollards, and in the case of the big new developments in the South Loop, bike lanes separated from traffic and sidewalks by trees.
The biggest downside to cycling in Chicago is the winter. Not just the cold and wind, but the fact that snow from the sidewalks is often shoveled into the bike lane.
I'm sure there are other American cities doing the same thing.
I think the one advantage unprotected bike lanes have is that they're easier to maintain. Re-paving is simplified. And you don't have to invest in tiny bike lane snowplows.
And unfortunately this likely won't happen. Despite a large coalition of biking advocates in SF, the SFMTA won't lift a finger. It's a corrupt, incompetent organizations that won't green light anything other than useless pork projects. And once the moneys in...the execution is irrelevant to them. Just look at the Van Ness BRT, Central Subway, Transbay Center construction.
In Austin, I basically refuse to use the two most significant protected bike lanes near where I live and work because drivers far too frequently turn into the lanes at intersections without looking. The city put signs up telling drivers to look and yield at some intersections, but the signs don't seem to have had any effect other than covering the ass of the city.
Well built infrastructure would be preferred. But ultimately we need more than just infrastructure. Drivers need to change their dangerous behavior too.
As a cyclist, this makes me think you're part of the problem. If a pedestrian seriously endangers you, 9 times out of 10 it means you fucked up. Maybe they fucked up too, but it wouldn't have been a problem if you were paying attention.
If nothing else, we have a lot more experience noticing and avoiding pedestrians than they do with us. If we want to improve bicycle awareness and acceptance, we all need to behave responsibly.
If I saw a small boy 50m away pulling at his mother's arm it used to be that I'd stop pedalling. Now, I'll also consider moving further into the road, I'll cover the brake, glance behind and potentially slow down.
[1] https://www.stockholmdirekt.se/nyheter/rekordmanga-har-valt-...
Example: Downtown San Francisco is largely inaccessible to cycling from the East Bay as there is no cycle lane on the old part of the Bay Bridge and insufficient capacity on BART and Ferries for large number of bikes.
There certainly are bad drivers, but I don't encounter things other commenters have mentioned, like people yelling. In fact I've noticed better behavior by drivers in the last ten–15 years, like people in cars much more willing to yield when I'm crossing a road from a bikeway.
More recently the city has been adding more protected bike lanes, and is now working on better maintenance in the winter, which is ok now but the biggest downside.
I perceive people behind the wheel to be increasingly reckless, entitled, and disrespectful. A lot of the reasons for this are already mentioned so I won't rehash the issues of distraction by smartphone, "sharing economy" de-professionalization of shared transportation, and driver resentment towards anybody not in a personal automobile claiming their lawful space on the road.
Somebody needs to mention that each and every person who drives a car is contributing to undeniable, irreversible climate destruction, and plausibly a future earth that won't be able to support human prosperity. EVs really are not much better than ICE vehicles - replace some fossil fuel consumption with enormous mineral extraction and it's a toss-up at best.
There are also a lot of (in)equity issues in our current transportation system that need to be sorted out. Cars reinforce the wealth gap by virtually ensuring economic success for those who can afford them while leaving those who can't out in the cold. Eisenhower's "drive" (pun intended) to build the US interstate system adopted and encouraged common, preexisting local policies that carved up any neighborhood where minority communities could begin to take hold, replacing them via eminent domain with freeways for white suburban commuters.
In sum, cars are bad. But they're so deeply seated in the collective USA brain stem that I'm not sure we will be able to do much to improve the situation.
I've been a year round bike commuter, but am fortunate to have worked the same job for 20 years. Likewise for my spouse. But that's pretty rare.
I doubt that I could justify bike commuting on solely practical grounds. I gain a great deal of enjoyment from it, and it's my main source of exercise.
Moving from New York to Seattle, the biking infrastructure there is appalling.
Manhattan - https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/planning/download/pdf/plans/tran...
Downtown Seattle - https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/transportation/tra...
I just moved to the Seattle area, and the bike infrastructure doesn't seem bad (my path includes Bainbridge Island and Colman Dock -> SLU). Bainbridge doesn't have great infrastructure on my path, but it has low traffic and bike aware drivers. Downtown has slow drivers, generally bike aware, and a pretty good amount of bike lanes, although some were thoughtfully put on the curb side of parking, which means unaware passengers get out without noticing me, and intersections mean I'm coming into the stream of traffic that might be turning right, but the parked cars make it hard for both of us to see each other. I didn't bike to work in the bay area, because my commute would have been on high traffic, high speed streets with frequent traffic lights and poor bike infra.
I haven't experienced New York though -- maybe you're saying its bike infra is appalling?
Seattle has a great trail system, which is wonderful until you're trying to get off the trail. East-west travel within Seattle is particularly appalling. There's a lot of painted bike lanes, which I don't feel very comfortable in, particularly in Seattle where the driving culture is passive-aggressive and unpredictable (as opposed to New York, where it's aggressive but pretty predictable, so avoiding negative consequences is pretty easy)
On the one hand, people's dogs run into the street to urinate, on the other hand, I have to slow down every time I approach the intersection, because I have no visibility of the flow of traffic because of the parked cars; and the flow of traffic has no visibility of me because of the parked cars, so I can't even get upset at drivers who are ready to make a right turn there and don't give me space.
Parking protected would be something like 2nd, where the parking is on the outside of the curb; similar configurations can be found on part of Broadway, and Dexter south of Mercer St.
[1] https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6082691,-122.3410045,68m/dat...
[2] https://www.google.com/maps/@47.6220637,-122.3397978,3a,75y,...
Seattle, on the other hand, has way more driveways than I'm used to; they also tend to be so close to the curb, with poor lines of sight coming out of the driveway, that they have to have those blaring sirens warning about cars pulling out.
IMO, a bunch of several-thousand-pound cars is much more in terms of protection than the flimsy flexposts you see around Seattle. I just don't feel as comfortable biking around here.
While many US cities have made some efforts to increase cycling, I think they focus too much on new infrastructure and too little on quality infrastructure and enforcement against dangerous drivers.
Just look at illegal parking in the bike lane to know how important cycling is to the city. In Austin, nothing has changed with regards to this in the 5 years I have lived here. The reason is clear to me: the city is happy to give cyclists lip service, but anything that might involve actual effort or possibly making drivers irritated doesn't happen (unless it's new construction).
I have gone through cycling stop sign enforcement efforts twice, once on bike to work day! http://www.kut.org/post/austin-police-ticket-47-campus-area-...
I always stop, and as I recall I got a thumbs up from one cop on bike to work day.
In contrast I have never run into any of the enforcement efforts against drunk or distracted driving. I am confident such things occur, as I have asked the police about it before and they explained their procedures. But I get the impression that drunk and distracted driving are not taken as seriously as they should be. Based on what they said, I should periodically run into the distracted driving enforcement near schools (so they can write double price tickets), but I am still waiting 4 years later.
I also was assaulted by a driver once while riding in a lane marked for bikes. (Physical assault; they did not hit me with their car.) I called the police, who to their credit showed up promptly and took my statement. They didn't do anything else, though. A cop later told me that if I wanted anything to come of this, I'd have to file at municipal court and pay a fee. I talked to a lawyer who said nothing would come of this, even though I have the entire incident on my helmet camera. The city police chief in the past said they take complaints from cyclists at municipal court seriously: https://bicycleaustin.info/forum/viewtopic.php?id=1511
But I am not seeing it. Why would I make what is effectively a $100+ donation to a police department who only cares enough to give me lip service? If they actually wanted to get more cyclists to report bad drivers, they'd reduce or waive the fee for cyclists.
A lot of progress needs to be made in the US to make cycling a better option.
now in Prague with pretty much zero bike lanes and hilly terrain so i don't really bother even trying to bike here, people in general respect rules more, but there are still plenty BMW/audi/Mercedes drivers who think laws are only for poor people
Now I work from home that ratio. When I do go to the office it’s at a much lower % than previously because the habit provides a boost.
I'm getting tired of being a second class citizen on the road, tired of near-misses with people staring at their phones while driving, and tired of not being able to carry much of anything. I have panniers but it doesn't do much good for quick trips to the hardware store or the supermarket on the way home.
(edit: I am in the US)
You're really more like third class; second class would be walking, where at least you have physically separated lanes most places and your own signals.
It's true that many cyclists behave poorly, but look at countries like Denmark or the Netherlands where they actually support biking, and the cyclists there behave normally. Almost like people don't respect a system that clearly doesn't respect them.
Take a Dutch person and ask them to bike in the US, and see how quickly they either adopt the aggressive habits of American cyclists or just give up entirely.
Though I've cycled thousands of miles in prior years, I no longer do, partly because I don't want to be associated with such behavior.
... which takes about 2/3s of the time public transport takes, which is, again, probably slightly faster than driving to office (without counting the time it'd take to find a parking spot, which would probably double the commute).
interestingly, for me, riding at a relaxed pace is pretty much as fast as going as fast as possible, as red light luck is such a big factor.
I'd much rather ride my bike, but after close call after close call, and even intentionally threatening behavior, I stopped riding and started exclusively walking. Also in the US, and I follow the law very carefully when riding. Doesn't matter. I've had things thrown at me, been coal-rolled, been tailgated by large trucks honking, been screamed at by little old ladies telling me pay my taxes.
The infrastructure isn't there, and well meaning bike lanes make it worse by encouraging bad and unpredictable behaviors. There are bad cyclists out there. there are many more that try to follow the rules. There needs to be an investment in infrastructure, maintenance, education and enforcement. Until then, I'll keep walking to commute and riding for pleasure.
I moved to Winston Salem, NC 5 years ago and thought that I would in no way do bike commuting here. I actually tried it though starting in March this year and I've been surprised it's actually worked out OK -- drivers are a lot more considerate than I'd expected, and I haven't had many close calls. The law is quite explicit on clearance for bikes. From home to my co-working space is 9 or 10 miles. I'm hanging out at Camino Bakery downtown right now working, and will bike to my daughter's ballet lesson soon. Bike commuting isn't hugely popular here but it's growing, and the Bird scooters have really caught on around downtown and the several universities in the area, so I think there will be increasing awareness of alternative commuting modes here. I think for some motorized e-scooters will be more practical than bikes.
... I'd just like to see the "Idaho stop" legalized.
EDIT: Idaho stop