This reviewer has clearly had an axe to grind with ML's claims for years, and this is a continuation of that.
EDIT: that doesn't seem like the same comment I replied to, did you significantly expand it?
This reviewer has clearly had an axe to grind with ML's claims for years, and this is a continuation of that.
EDIT: that doesn't seem like the same comment I replied to, did you significantly expand it?
Other systems in the same space (like Hololens, the Rift and the Vive) didn’t put such simulated imagery front-and-centre in their marketing materials.
The Rift and Vive are not in the same space as Hololens/ML at all, they shouldn't be lumped together.
https://mashable.com/2015/10/06/microsoft-hololens-misleadin...
https://www.theverge.com/2015/10/6/9465839/microsoft-hololen...
Going back further, Microsoft has a history of this with things like Project Milo on the Kinect. These things really don't matter in the end though. Its the technology itself that matters, and how good or bad it is relative to the market.