Symbian Imploding As Foundation Head Resigns | Hacker News Reader

Symbian Imploding As Foundation Head Resigns

mashable.com

20 pointsnoarchy12 comments

Good.

I won't miss their stupid branding (http://developer.symbian.org/).

I won't miss their slow app signing (http://twitter.com/buddycloud/status/13062324669 (ended up taking 6 weeks)).

I won't miss all the crap we went through to get buddycloud working on this godforsaken platform (good work @incrediblepants).

It could have been so good. But Nokia dithered around opening the platform. Even with an open platform, how many hackers really want to look at some long-closed source code and start fixing strangers bugs? Meh!

Had the platform had gained adoption amongst hackers with an ecosystem comparable with Android, writing and debugging code on it was still at least 5x slower than iOS or Android and about as enjoyable as pulling fingernails with pliars. Then you were fighting back up against a terrible widget-set and UI (http://n8fail.tumblr.com/). Yes, I know the "but Nokia sells more phones blah". A big ship will also keep drifting for 10km after its propellor has fallen off.

On the other hand, working on Symbian has been a good example of where concentrating on niches can reap benefits; Symbian never received the hype that some other platforms have enjoyed and did allow buddycloud to gain about 500k users that were underserved by the dearth of decent social and location apps on the platform. That's been a win for us.

This article is about Mr Williams leaving. The writing has been on the wall for ages - all the good people left two years ago: hired away by other mobile startups in London like Truphone or to start their own ventures.

I hope Nokia can get their shit together because I like their hardware and have some friends working for them. But they don't deserve to.

Did you develop your app in Symbian C++ or Qt? What are your thoughts on Qt? I have never done any Symbian C++ stuff so cannot comment on that, but I am very much liking Qt overall.

We started buddycloud development before Nokia did anything with Trolltech. Having switched to Qt earlier would have helped and mean that we could easily port to the N900 and what I hope nokia see as the future of their platform.

Qt does seem nice and has helped Skype build a client that looks decent on most platforms.

But for programming mobile apps, I would be more inclined to try and answer the framework question from a "What can I use on Android or iOS" POV. I see there are some java bindings for Android-land but the project is now abandoned. For iOS-land, I guess it depends on Steve's mood that month.

Ahh but Symbian C++ is not really C++...more like its bastard stepchild which manages to remove most of the nice stuff from C++, and is just different enough to make you rewrite your whole app </bitter>

This is precisely the sort of thing that no doubt scared away potential developers, including me. Having owned a smartphone that ran on Symbian, it was only natural (for me) that I'd want to look at how to develop for the platform. When I did, I was not encouraged.

My impression about Qt on Symbian: it does not look native (yet) and I believe it is slightly slower than native apps. So I have not even started looking into that deeper. It is really easier to develop for Qt and I would use it for my own personal app, but for that PythonS60 is better IMHO.

As for Symbian C++ API looks reasonably good. I am investigating possibility to write one commercial application and I have all required libraries/services in my phone.

Documentation is good. Community support is reasonably good as well.

As for language itself - it is not real C++ as mentioned in other comment.

Development on Linux is possible but be ready for unpleasant surprises: no native emulator, SVG files that can't be drawn using Inkscape and etc. There is QEMU initiative but it is not ready for general usage. I have tried to build syborg but I have failed to do that.

Nokia's earnings call is coming up in a few days. Lets see what type of numbers they put out before declaring the death of Symbian.

From the article: "Symbian may be the largest phone operating system in the world by marketshare, but its free fall is approaching terminal velocity."

I know it looks that way from the American perspective, but globally Symbian is still very much holding its own.

Nokia, Symbian's corporate daddy and only remaining serious user, is selling more smartphones each quarter and increasing marketshare. That does not justify such hyberbole as "free fall at terminal velocity".

(iSuppli reported 11.6% growth for Nokia/Symbian in Q2 2010: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news/2010/10/isuppli-smartpho... )

I know the next argument: you're not talking about last quarter's numbers, but an impending implosion of Symbian under the onslaught of Android... Well, so far that's just speculation. Nokia has managed to hold its global marketshare for over a decade against both big Western competitors and nimble Chinese copycats. They seem to know something about this market.

For what it's worth, Nokia is predicting that 50 million smartphones with the latest Symbian^3 platform will be sold next year. That's on top of cheaper units running Symbian^1 or even older variants.

These devices are not iPhone killers or any other such nonsense, but they're well built and usable. They will keep selling by the millions in countries where Nokia has a strong brand and people know how much they're paying for their phone, unlike the U.S. where the phone's real price is hidden in an exorbitantly overpriced wireless contract. (I can't believe people regularly pay $80+ / month for their mobile over there...)

It doesn't matter how many low-end phones are sold.

It's near impossible to put apps on them and even if the user can find a way to install an app, the users that buy low end phones have very little correlation with those that have a data contract.

And even if they can a) get an app installed, b) have data, you have to deal with the crappy S40 UI. Totally not mom-friendly.

My point is, it's pointless even considering these Symbian^1(who came up with such a fucking stupid branding as "^1"?) as being anything as a write off. They don't play a role in the app economy and there is such price competition at the low end that few profits could filter up to subsidise the smartphone division.

So let's focus on Nokia's smartphone numbers rather than total shipments. Again... a big ship will keep drifting for a while. But eventually it will come to an end. I've seen many defections from the Symbian camp to the Android camp and have yet to find one developer yearning to go back.

You make a fair point about the app ecosystem. It has been horribly broken on Symbian for years (at least since they stopped allowing unsigned apps sometime around 2004). Nokia has recently made strides to improve things by concentrating on Qt as the toolkit of choice across the board and streamlining the Ovi Store for developers, but it still has a a long way to go.

But note that my post didn't mention apps, and neither did the original article. I wanted to offer a counterpoint to the popular American notion that Symbian will vanish any day now. Regardless of the app ecosystem, that won't happen with Nokia shipping hundreds of millions of Symbian handsets over the next years.

(BTW, what's your beef with S40 [which is not Symbian-based]? As far as featurephones go, I find S40 quite tolerable. It's the Symbian S60 lineage that really sucks UI-wise...)

Am not totally sure but looks like you may be confusing Symbian^1 and S40. Symbian^1 and S40 are completely distinct. Symbian^1 is also called S60 5th edition and runs on many smartphones such as N97, X6 etc. S40 is their feature phone platform. Also, with Ovi Store the app distribution model is better than it used to be. Last I heard, 2.3 million downloads per day were being made from Ovi Store. Ovi Store has the advantage of offering paid apps in many many countries though it is certainly very behind in terms of features like app updates and even basic search sometimes.

You are right. I was confusing Symbian^1 with S40. I've heard the 2.3M figure. That sounds about right given our experience and place in the download rank. I'm generally feeling negative about the whole platform now. To me that figure is 2.3M moments of pain and WTF? per day. :)

Reply on news.ycombinator.com