Porsche to Cull Diesels in Shift Toward Electric Vehicles
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
From : http://www.porscheownersmanuals.com/2014-cayenne/10/268-2228...
Risk of engine damage and/or damage to the fuel system if diesel fuel with a higher concentration of biodiesel than 5 % is used like B11, B20 or B100.
Only use diesel fuel with a blend of 5 % biodiesel (B5) or below.
----------------------------------------------
If I cannot even put B20 in it, there is not point for going with diesel, Cayenne Diesel is the slowest and most un-porshe Porsche!
As far as I know everything produced today is B20 rated or higher. The fuel systems are all made by the same two manufacturers for the most part.
2017-2018 manual: http://www.porscheownersmanuals.com/2017-cayenne-manual/16/2...
I do not think there is 2019 Cayenne Diesel model, but I do not see anything other B5 or less.
I suppose they may simply be running out old spec stock. Anyway, to your point, it is disappointing. Along with the whole defeat device thing.
Manufacturing bio diesel creates CO2.
VW documentation says to use B5 or lower in my car, as well, and it's known to be one of the best engines ever for biodiesel. The previous owner and I have run B99 in it for years with no problems at all.
It's not much different from running Linux on your computer. Just because they don't test it that way doesn't mean it will necessarily cause problems.
It would be a much bigger victory for environmental campaigners if the wider VW group were to join Porsche, Toyota, Volvo, Subaru and Fiat Chrysler in announcing an end to diesel in cars.
It would be really fun to have a waste veg oil burning Porsche though
This isn't something that can be bought back. "I drive a Porsche" doesn't have the same implications it once did.
And the Urus manages to be even more flagrant brand engineering since it's an Lamborghini version of a Porsche Cayenne, which is just an Audi Q7, all based off an VW Touareg.
If there's a current Porsche vehicle hurts their brand, I think it's the Panamera. All their other vehicles are either sportiest in class or best in class, but typically both; the Panamera is neither.
But Porsche haven't gone anywhere near full BMW yet, and BMW is still cooler than Maserati and Lexus. I think Porsche's brand value is doing just fine. Not every car manufacturer needs to be McLaren/Ferrari/Lamborghini/Koenigsegg/Bugatti, and arguably, Porsche was never part of that group.
The Lamborghini Urus shares the same VW group platform as the Audi Q8 and the Bentley Bentayga. [1] [2]
[1] https://www.autoevolution.com/news/lamborghini-urus-meets-au...
[2] https://www.quattrodaily.com/photo-comparison-audi-q8-concep...
They're all the same car with different packaging. The biggest giveaway is all of the clones use Audi's pretty distinctive rear air suspension system, the odd for Audi/VW rear wheel steering, and the uncharacteristic for Porsche/Lamborghini ZF-8HP automatic transmission.
Porsche’s success has meant many other “cool” brands following suit.
Also Lamborghini, by your metric, ceased being cool when they released the LM002. Were they still cool between the years they ceased production of the LM002 and began production of the Urus?
Really does suck for cool kids these days. Can’t buy RR, Bentley, Maserati, Porsche, Lamborghini, and soon enough Ferrari ( after they release the Purosangue). Oh and to play it safe avoid Aston Martin, because the DBX concept.
* 918 Spyder? Thank the crossovers and Panamera
* Cayman GT4 and Boxster Spyder? Thank the crossovers and Panamera.
* 911R and GT3 Touring? Thank the crossovers and Panamera.
* GT2 RS? Thank the crossovers and Panamera.
* The 911 Speedster that should see production? Thank the crossovers and Panamera.
* The track-only €701,948-priced 935 they're making 77 copies of? Take a guess what helps make it happen.
HN headline is v misleading