Hacker News Reader

Comment by mkr-hn | Hacker News Reader

One interpretation makes this a post about the success of an innovator.

One interpretation makes this post one giving false credit for the creation of entire industries. It is something I've seen from a minority of Apple users.

It's a valid question.

View on HN

One interpretation is being charitable to the intelligence of the community who chose to upvote it; the other presumes they were either fooled, or that the minority you refer to has infiltrated HN and is on a mission to block-upvote Apple propaganda. A combination of the Principle of Charity and Occam's Razor makes the latter seem improbable.

That is a very good point. But with your original question, you brought it up in the form of a instigating, snarky question.

There is some inherent value of the iPhone and iPad in them being phones and tablets, respectively. A portion of their sales has nothing to do with innovation. I would agree.

That wasn't the intent. Amazing how easy it is to write a sentence that can come off in a number of unintended ways, isn't it? :)

He obviously meant that most of Apple's product line is less than 3 years old. The iPad, per se, did not exist three years ago, though of course the concept of a tablet computer is decades old.

>the concept of a tablet computer is decades old

And it's been dead in the water the whole time. There were many failed attempts at flying machines before the Wright brothes.

True, but I think the people saying things like "Apple didn't invent..." are about spaces like the smartphone market, or the mp3 player market (or even selling mp3s online). While many might describe the iPad as "just a larger iPhone," I think that it's different enough from other tablet offerings to give Apple some amount of credit.

There were flying machines before the Wright brothers, i.e. balloons. Likewise there are modestly successful tablets which predate the iPad such as the Fujitsu Stylistic series.

I believe a distinction was made between lighter-than-air craft like balloons, and heavier-than-air craft like planes and helicopters and gliders.

Apple has in fact created entire industries. Apple created the modern smartphone. Previous to the iPhone, all phones were feature phones, though of course many were advertised as "smartphones" because they had simple PDA functionality. The android phone was a copy of the RIMM phone with the keyboard which was much like a treo. Now they are all making touch screen phones with appstores, and aping all of the other features of this product. Sure, things with CPUs in them have existed long before the digital phone and before the laptop, etc. But the iPhone did create a new industry-- the touch based phone.

The iPad also created the tablet industry. Sure, people had tried tablets before, even Apple did with the actually quite successful newton (though this was stylus based like the palm pilot, and other copies.) But the computer tablet industry that is taking share away from laptops didn't exist before this year.

Apple created two industries. I'm a fan of apple because they are always innovative, always honest, and they always try to ship quality products. They're about the only company I can say that about.

I don't know why people should diminish that. This is a gold standard we should all attempt to emulate (And I don't mean by copying their products, but by copying their methods and standards.)

You sound a lot like someone trying hard to make an inventor out of Apple. Making a hit product with some new features in an industry isn't the same as making the industry.

If we go by that reasoning, Microsoft created the word processor industry.

Innovator isn't a dirty word. Let Apple take credit for what they've accomplished.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com