I don't know if I agree with the author that neoliberalism (or capitalism, which I think is closer to what she's really talking about) is the cause of all the ills she mentions, mainly because I don't think we should frame it that way. "Neoliberalism bad, [other system of choice] good" is not the way to consider it. As bad as neoliberal democracy/captialism is, would she rather live in autocratic China or feudal medieval England? The question isn't whether the current system is bad, it's whether there exists a demonstrably better system we can now attempt to implement.
I think, at least for the United States, the answer to that question is very much so, yes. It's called socialism, and most all the other democratic societies are already doing it. It also doesn't necessarily mean the end of capitalism, so much as an adjustment to the rules and formula.