Rejected Then Recruited: Our Journey into Y Combinator
repl.it
repl.it
Interesting, especially since PG has stated that many a good company looks like "just a fun toy" in the beginning. I'd have thought that would be a heuristic YC folks keep in mind, and not use it to dismiss an idea.
> Months later, after demo-day, Michael told us that they were going to reject us for sure, but they were dissuaded by how exceptionally well we did during the interview.
What do you think contributed to doing "exceptionally well", especially since it sounds like you had a different outlook on the interview?
I think it was the fact that we've thought through the big questions of our business, as it were, and are able to show the work: how we arrived at the answers, what clues or experiments to run the validate that we have the right answer, and how we could change course if we didn't have the right answer.
They don't expect to have figured everything out -- after all that's what early stage startups are about. However, they expect you to have thought things through. Like there shouldn't be questions at the interview that are fundamentally new.
Finally, I think keeping composure under pressure helped.
With that in mind, I take a little issue with a YC partner saying the repl.it is a "YC Story." On the contrary, I think YC is a part of the "repl.it" story, and they were mistaken to take so long to see the value in the company.
I think the "yc story" was more about the interview process etc.
It's good to know that pg is still hacking, and still around:
he said that it was PG who found us on Hacker News
Wherever you are pg, we miss you!