Old Concept Cars
oldconceptcars.com
oldconceptcars.com
This would come from a tradeoff between going very bold with something that won't have a chance in a million to become the future, or staying very close to the present and showing an iteration on what could be the next year's model.
For context, the Audi TT went out in 1998: https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/audi-tt-coupe-1998.html
Audi was iterating actual products on designs very close I think to seat's concept cars.
Or as I like to call it, the Volkswagen Lupo: https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volkswagen_Lupo
The little egg car seems almost futuristic today, the only giveaway being the narrow steering column.
The one with the steering joint in the middle of the car was like every last place British entry on Full Metal Challenge. Turns out that's a terribly impractical idea.
This concept basically invented the minivan/MPV (no sliding doors, but most European MPVs don't have them).
After Fiat/Lancia passed on putting it into production themselves, multiple manufacturers took note and began working on their own production versions. The Japanese were actually the first to market with the 1982 Nissan Prairie and 1983 Mitsubishi Chariot. The Americans and Europeans were next: Chrysler launched the 1984 Dodge Caravan and Plymouth Voyager, while Matra and Renault launched the 1984 Renault Espace (it was designed by Matra and originally intended to be sold by PSA as a Talbot... but PSA killed the Talbot brand and with it their partnership with Matra at the last minute, so Matra took the design to Renault).
Makes the old Scion xB look downright charming, and I didn’t think that was possible.
So many of these seem like obviously terrible ideas, and yet, these are what happens when you design products without customers.
You can see where some of them were just derivations of other companies design languages, where others were the expression of one meaninglessly novel idea (the catamaran car). Some of them you can see the thing they thought would be good (big windshield, aerodynamics, ornamentation, minimalism, quirkiness, etc), but when you tried to wrap a car around that idea, it was uncanny and un-car-like.
For each of these abominations, there are software and startup analogs, I'm sure of it.
Now days most cars, web pages, apps, phones, TVs, look the same, yes that has its benefits and maybe customers just want the same old things, but I always wonder how different designs would be if apple made a different iPhone, Ford a different model T, xerox a different UI...
I bet you could find a TON of software/startup analogs using the same logic.
http://oldconceptcars.com/1930-2004/nissan-126x-concept-1970...
[0] https://cardesignnews.com/media/imported/servlet/file/275197...
http://oldconceptcars.com/1930-2004/paul-arzens-loeuf-electr...
Too early by 100 years!