The difference between the Harvard Law Review and glib dismissals of a serious issue is the other 14,000 words of the article.
The profession requires one to be outwardly strident, speak up and fight for your points lest the opposing counsel win.
We have electrician learn by doing electrical work. Doctors do residencies. If you aren't the right personality for the profession, then that's the breaks.
And finally, length of ones document is not an indication of quality. If that were the case, the United States Constitution (shortest in the world, ~4000 words ) wouldn't be the longest tenured.
Those qualities and actions bear little relation to what the vast majority of lawyers do at work. They do, however, closely resemble lawyers as portrayed on television and in fiction.
No one wants a lawyer who writes weak contracts.