RSA Animate – Changing Education Paradigms
comment.rsablogs.org.uk
comment.rsablogs.org.uk
Are they just high-profile, high-quality rants, hoping to get others to come up with changes? Or is there something more concrete backing these that isn't disseminated with them, preventing their (really good?) ideas from being implemented?
I've only seen a few, but are others more useful? They're all interesting, but those aren't the same thing.
But of course this is completely antithetical to his latter point, which is that group based learning/problem-solving is important. You can't have groups if everyone is going at their own pace.
The happy medium might be to structure elementary education more like college, with the ability to take 100 level classes in the 4th year or whatnot. But of course, this is far more expensive than the batch method because you have to have many more classes. To support so many classes you have to have many more children, which means vastly larger schools, so you might only be able to do it in densely populated cities.
Isn't this how adults learn? (And children too, when out of the classroom.) If you want to learn something new, say how to program in Haskell, what do you do? You probably don't try to find an institution to which you pay a lot of money and which offers you in return a seat in a room along with thirty others like you in which an instructor talks to you for a few hours a week.
Instead, if you want to learn Haskell programming, you check for learning materials online and go through them at your own pace. When you get stuck, you find online forums where you can ask questions. Also, as you learn, you answer other people's questions on the forums. You are learning at your own pace but you are not isolated.
My friends that did group projects in a class, by comparison, are quite good at it.
He has plenty of ideas. This speech is trying to get people to see that the current ideas aren't working and work together to create a new system of education.
Further research and tests of changing policies are needed.
Don't treat schooling like a factory.
Don't group students by age.
Don't teach around the concept of there just being one answer.
Don't segregate people into two tracks: academic and working.
A lot of the things he's talking about are the same as what Maria Montessori advocated. If I have kids I plan on sending them to a Montessori school if I can afford it.
Do mix age groups so that older kids can teach younger kids and thus learn the material better themselves, and younger kids can look up to the more successful older kids. If age groups are mixed, then there's might be less room for thuggery.
Do teach that there are multiple answers by having more open-ended and creative assignments.
By the way, the elementary school I went to had a special one-month period one year called "mini-course" month or something like that, where everyone could choose one of the many offered mini courses and do just that every day. This was when I got to go to the small computer lab all day every day for a month and learn basic and a database program on Apple II's. Perhaps one of the best months of my life, and incredibly enriching. You would probably never see anything like this if scoring well on a standardized test is the most important measure of a school.
Transcript of one interview:
http://www.ttfuture.org/files/2/pdf/gotto_interview.pdf
mp3 of another interview:
http://jari.podbean.com/mf/web/ja8dm2/LivingHero19--JohnGatt...
He also has a couple books in particular "Dumbing Us Down" and "Weapons of Mass Instruction".