The South African mountains older than continents
bbc.com
bbc.com
The Barberton gold deposits were formed in an interesting process where gold saturated fluids burst into underground fissures, and the resulting rapid cooling led to crystallization. The layout of the deposits a highly unpredictable. You can mine nothing for hundreds of meters (which takes years) before hitting a chamber that will sustain you for a decade. Super interesting. And hard to run a business like that.
Thanks for posting.
The article doesn't seem to go deep enough into the logistics of this apparent contradiction. Did the mountain range appear in the middle of the ocean and the continent gradually formed around it? Or was the mountain range simply part of an ancient continent that isn't immediately recognizable as Africa, but parts of which eventually became parts of Africa?
Here's an action replay. If you follow the red blob I think that must be the mountains. I recommend setting the speed to 2x https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovT90wYrVk4
There was a lot of moving going on. The purple bit seems to have ended up as the Hamersley Range in Australia. (http://www.oldest.org/nature/mountain-ranges/)
Multi-cellular life appears at about 2:30
Plants start colonizing land and the Appalachian mountains form around 4:15
Fish show up around 4:10
Animals start colonizing land at 4:20
Dinosaur show up around 4:40
Mammals show up somewhere between 4:43 and 4:46*
Crocodiles show up at 4:54
Dinosaurs go extinct at 4:55
Humans show up, invent language, paint a cave in Europe, litter stone tools all over North America, domesticate animals, invent the wheel, learn agriculture, cross the oceans by flying, invent computers, drop atomic bombs, go to the moon, send glorified RC cars to drive around other planets, invent the internet and shitpost on hackernews at 5:03
*turns out it's kind of hard to tell mammals from mammal-like reptiles when all you have is fossils, hence the wide range
Just mind blowing that it could recreate all that movement. Imperfect as to the details, sure.
Thank you for sharing.
Reconstruction of where the plates were in the past is mostly determined by paleomagnetism (subject area of my PhD). When lava erupts and cools, it gets magnetized in the direction of the earth's magnetic field. This can be measured directly in the rocks themselves or seen as magnetic anomalies in the oceans. Since the magnetic field flips directions every 1/2 million years or so (a somewhat random process) the rocks around the ocean ridges that are spreading and erupting continuously all get magnetized in one direction and then another. This produces magnetic anomaly stripes that have been measured all over the world.
Using these ocean stripes, which can be treated like slices in time, it is quite straight forward to reconstruct what Pangea, the most recent supercontinent, looked like and where it was located when it began to break up about 175 million years ago. Almost all of the current ocean floor was created after this breakup, so before that reconstructions become much more difficult.
This a very simplified explanation. The older the rock, the less likely the original magnetization was preserved. Also, the continents have been growing slowly over the 4.5 billion history of the earth. The earth was almost all ocean at the start. The oldest rocks known are about 3.2 billion years old, so before that almost nothing is known about the magnetic field of earth (some older zircons survive in these rocks, but they are unlikely to preserve a record of the magnetic field). The wikipedia entry on plate tectonics is a decent place to start to read more about the process.
The further back we go the more unreliable and less certain we are that this is a reliable mechanism. The rocks get changed by chemical reactions or heat. The solid inner core grows, so the solid core size will change the dynamics of the field greatly. The whole mantle seems to have moved very quickly all at once durning some times, but so this was so long ago there are few rocks that have been studied that this strange possibility is still highly debated.
If someone tells you about the magnetic field of the Earth at 2 billion years, they are just stating a speculative theory. The last 160 million years, we have a pretty good idea.
If you want to learn in depth about this science, I recommend you check out a text book by Butler (1992) https://www.geo.arizona.edu/Paleomag/
which is good intro textbook or Tauxe (2018) https://earthref.org/MagIC/books/Tauxe/Essentials/ Which is more up-to-date and more in-depth.
Or even chat online if you like. email is in my profile.
That’s one way that terraformation works. It’s quite normal for something like a volcano (or a bunch of volcanoes / mountain range) to form, and then for land to develop around it. This is how many islands develop, and why many islands also have a mountain.
In the future the islands of Japan could become one big continent with a mountain range backbone.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17892966
I have a sneaking suspicion that journalists spend most of their time on social media sites like HN and just repackage stories they read here.
Also, the title should read "South African mountains older than current continents".
The article mentions it is older than the african continent and that is correct. But that doesn't make it older than continents in general. The Makhonjwa Mountains and Vaalbara ( the first supercontinent ) were created in the same time period.
(NoScript Index ⇒ The amount of times one has to press "Temporarily allow all this page" before the actual content one is coming for shows.)
* www.bbc.com
* admin.brightcove.com
* emp.bbci.co.uk
* nav.files.bbci.co.uk
* static.bbci.co.uk
If anyone of those are denied it will fail to load the content.
Some pictures can be found here: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1575/gallery/
And a very short wikipedia entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Makhonjwa_Mountains
And as a bonus in that json you can read every other crappy travel article they've ever written about South Africa .
Works for me in the UK FWIW, Safari Mac.