Microplastic pollution in oceans is far worse than feared, say scientists
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
Microplastic is a concern. Larger-than-microplastic (?macroplastic) is also a worry, because it degrades into microplastic over time.
Our location [2] means that we don't get the typical beach waste washing up with the tides, and much of what we gather is fishing industry consumables. Nylon nets can usually be identified to a given vessel or fleet, but when they reach EOL they are sometimes shredded at sea -- which turns one net into many thousands of pieces 5cm / 2" long -- or dumped on known wreck sites.
These sites are not fished by commercial fishing organisations and the nets become ghost nets, catching the marine life that typically teems on wrecks…which then dies, degrades, and attracts other feeders, and the process repeats.
Anecdotally, I've had conversations with people in the industry over the past few years and it's common for nets to be left in situ once quota is met, since it's cheaper to replace a net than go over quota in port.
I realise all this isn't directly related to the OP article, but there are other considerations outside the microplastics generated from cosmetics, etc.
[1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wDmlyQFluRCyT6m_ndoO...
[2] https://www.google.com/maps/place/Crackington+Haven,+Bude+EX...