Makes you wonder why smaller family or close-friends type social networks don't work. I guess the value isn't there to build it because it can't sprawl in the same way as other social networks.
Makes you wonder why smaller family or close-friends type social networks don't work. I guess the value isn't there to build it because it can't sprawl in the same way as other social networks.
Paid can avoid that, but of course has it a lot harder to get people to sign up, so those options tend to grow very slowly, often too slowly.
Probably because Facebook Groups covers this use case pretty well and everyone already has a Facebook account. That's my guess.
Because they are run by for profit companies, operating in a capitalistic framework.
That is one of the core pillars of free software as envisioned by Stallman - software that can truly serve the needs of the people, because it is not subject to those pressures.
A world where your girlfriend’s family could painlessly deploy their own such service for just a few users and not have to worry about a company shutting it down whenever they feel like it would be wonderful.
The margins of successful products also need to fund all the failed attempts at making stuff that ultimately no one wants.
I think innovation without speculation is impossible and speculation has a cost.
For instance grand-parents don’t want to pay for instagram but will pay premium to have great pictures printed and framed.
Or pay to have their own domain name.
People pay for Dropbox or Squarespace.
I’d totally see my parents paying for a Synology if someone could install it and maintain it for around 10$/€ a month. Currently they pay for one time install fees + maintenance hours for their windows machine for instance, it’s not a big stretch.