People here in Southern California exercise and prefer extra sunshine. Farmers here are against the repeal as well. Even popular mechanic endorses DST as a good thing:
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a18011/...
Every reference that I have seen agrees with https://agamerica.com/myth-vs-fact-daylight-saving-time-farm... that farmers don't like DST. In fact the original reason to introduce it was to save energy, and it doesn't do that either.
I know that I will vote for the repeal.
But I did find that crime rates drop: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2015/10/29/figh...
I will not be voting for the repeal.
The California bill is for permanently being on DST. Which is equivalent to the present for most of the year, in my opinion is better in the winter, and avoids the disruption twice a year.
And to answer your question, I do engage in outdoor activities. Mostly hiking and the beach. My preference for hiking is for later in the day because I want to sleep in, and wait for the heat to break.
Saskatchewan has never had DST.
Seriously, arguments for DST are absolutely ridiculous. In the summer when the days are longest it kicks in, which is pointless. In the winter when days are shorter it's not active.
Throw DST into the trash where it belongs.
If you want to be outside in the sunshine, you can go outside while it's sunny, whatever time of day that happens to be.