> Using Cloudflare's gateway, you can also build a website that’s hosted entirely on IPFS, but still available to your users at a custom domain name.
This is huge step forward for the distributed web!
> Using Cloudflare's gateway, you can also build a website that’s hosted entirely on IPFS, but still available to your users at a custom domain name.
This is huge step forward for the distributed web!
Is there a Soundcloud clone on IPFS anywhere? (One that doesn't provide you with cloud storage, only the public index)
That's a bit of a requirement when building a serious service/website.
Presumably someone could sell "pinning as a service" for fairly cheap: a popular file will be widely cached, so the service will rarely need to provide it; and an unpopular file will be rarely requested.
Is there a reason to believe that such service would be cheaper than a "traditional" CDN?
Adding IPFS ontop of this would make it more robust.
Not a huge Cloudflare fan, but I will admit this is cool of them to spend engineering time and money on.
EDIT: Thanks for the efforts to promote the Distributed Web. A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one.
Cheers!
My impression of the public gateways was that the end user would need to know the content hash of your website which makes for a poor user experience.
This announcement claims the end user just uses the website as they normally would by visiting example.com but behind the scenes there is no central web server because the content is pulled from IPFS.
DNS was the missing piece :)
https://developers.cloudflare.com/distributed-web/ipfs-gatew...
What Cloudflare adds to the mix is their infrastructure for automatic TLS certs.
The only problem is that I have to visit my website once in a while, otherwise the content is deleted on the gateway.
You will still need to run a node to host your own content on IPFS. Unless you just simply plan on using data that already exists in the wild