We hold people with power to account. Why not algorithms?
theguardian.com
theguardian.com
I'm sure this comes with the requirement for answers to questions given at the end of the article:
“What power have you got? “Where did you get it from? “In whose interests do you use it? “To whom are you accountable? “How do we get rid of you?” Because, ultimately, we can’t just think of algorithms in isolation. We have to think of the failings of the people who design them – and the danger to those they are supposedly designed to serve.
“What power have you got? “Where did you get it from? “In whose interests do you use it? “To whom are you accountable? “How do we get rid of you?”
Sure, working for Boeing or Google doesn't make you evil. But where is the line when you are asked to do something, perhaps trivial, to advance a project that denies humans rights, or life? When do you take your spine and walk?
There is no good or evil but thinking makes it so...