From a utilitarian perspective, ISTM such a situation could only be considered a net good for the cow, let alone the people who eat the meat. A good but truncated life has to be better than no life at all. The counter-argument would appear to be one of moral absolutism rather than utilitarianism—that killing a sentient being unnecessarily is simply wrong. Which isn't to say that that argument is necessarily flawed; I'm not sure there's even an argument to be had once you get to the level of disagreement on moral absolutes. But I do think the utilitarian aspect is interesting to consider.
Edit: As an aside, I recognize that the vast majority of farms (ie factory farms) are nothing like the idyllic farm described.
Having said that, there is often a benefit to plants from human cultivation - but it’s not an absolute benefit. Our love of fruit results in their trees/plants being cared for by humans. Many of the plant products we eat don’t result in the death of the plant. If those plants could speak I think they’d thankful of their caretakers. Sure we’re not planting most of their seeds, but they do have a maintained population.
I wish no animals ever suffered at the hands of humans. This world is full of beauty, and it’s awful that so much of human activity results in life’s death and extinction - including deforestation for crops.
What you mean is nature not just humans. Life death cycle is natural thing.
World is full of beauty, but it is also full of suffering and pain, large portion of it not having to do anything with humans. Animals can starve in nature, get mutilated etc.
Nature is both sides of the coin, not just the pretty one.
As for what you eat, it’s very hard to scientifically prove what’s healthier for you. There are way too many outside factors that influence that. A lot of plants you buy in a shop are treated with chemicals in unhealthy way. Apple, carrots, tomatoes are all treated to ripe when they need to cos they are usually harvested before fully ripe.
And third thing, just cos you don’t need something doesn’t mean humans won’t do it, that’s, once again, in our nature.
Second, is proven that growing vegetables is more sustainable that growing meat.
That you don't want to see it doesn't mean there is not factual evidence. Do you want evidence? Start caring about looking for it. You can start here [1].
[1] H.O.P.E. documentary: https://youtu.be/pDg7tlEJD64
and no, i have zero problem to pay a visit to a slaughterhouse each time i want to eat a juicy steak.
The bigger problem is that eating meat, even if from small butchers, helps promoting meat consumption which, in turns, helps big industry continue making big money out of animal abuse and at the expense of everybody's natural environment.
Here you have what some former butchers have to say: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pDg7tlEJD64&t=4213
[0]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312055008_Vegetaria...