AMC Is Beating MoviePass at Its Own Game
fool.com
fool.com
Yet another example of reason from first principles :)
They’ve been pivoting around in search of something that can make them profitable eventually.
I have to wonder, though, why you'd want to go to the movies regularly these days, with all the dreck that Hollywood has been putting out in recent years. Maybe it's time for you guys to hit the $1.99 rentals on YouTube/Amazon/iTunes more often.
To use it as an excuse to join other members and see more films with new friends.
To get out of the hot summer sun and enjoy a few hours of entertainment inside a nice cool theater.
To simply enjoy blowing movie pass investor money that they were too dumb to hang onto because it’s hard to spot a unicorn and pets.com was taken this cycle.
It's the 'out' part that is important!
In a theater, you sit in the dark, if you are a good citizen, you don't talk. 90% of any social piece to going to a movies happens at dinner before or after, which you can still do and then go home to watch a movie.
The only problem is right now they are targeting business, but I hope to see a consumer version one day and if they can get it lighter, comfortable for 3 hours of continuous wearing and can replace a theatre screen.
I don't see why it can't replace a TV or movie experience.
Are you talking about gearvr? Or other “not really vr” headsets?
I want a "movie theater" that is essentially a private room with a TV that me, the spouse, and kids can watch it in. We can also pause for bathroom breaks and get food ordered/delivered. That's often why I just wait for the BluRay release and watch at home, the experience at the big chains is terrible.
Watching movies there has really made me appreciate the benefits of the big screen again.
I live in Dallas where we’re fortunate to have a half dozen of them. They’re all great, the food is excellent, staff is great, and on and on and on. I love this place and I go at least once a month probably and more during busy months.
It’s worth it!
Can’t have it all.
- Never noticed chewing / drinking / glasses
- The lights under the table is so dull I honestly don't even know where it is or how they even see it. I've looked under the table and can't seem to find it
- This may just be me but their projectors are just fine
https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/america/fif...
They started in 2011 and only had 20k subscribers in 2016. It wasn't until late 2017 that they sold majority stake to Helios and dropped the price to $10.
That's quite a Hail Mary pass. What lead to that after ~6 years? Were they out of money? Out of patience?
Arguably this is going to be the case going forward.
Increasingly, incumbents can move as fast as "disruptors" because information flows so quickly and nearly every major incumbent has learned that "disrupting yourself" is key to long term survival.
Incumbents can see threat trends as they are gaining traction, rapidly invest in an in-channel copycat (because they have so much cash on hand) and since they already have the user base, deploy the solution more easily.
I'm increasingly convinced that the orthogonal flanks that startups have been able to do to incumbents in high tech over the last 20 years, is not viable anymore.
Suddenly when I went to look on a saturday no theater within 10 miles of me had a show time for anything they had selected.
Part of the reason I got it over Sinema is because moviepass worked at my local indie film theater. The moviepass selection would probably never include things I wanted to see.
Side note if that theater offered an unlimited pass I'd jump on it in a heart beat. Their screenings are never full and they tend to bring back older things I'd want to see. When the Ghost in the Shell live action came out they showed the original anime version for example.
If they had stuck with trying to move people into just cheap tickets up front, nobody would have complained and they might have been able to reach critical mass. The problem is that the VC's wanted to cash out in 18 months or go broke--well they're getting what they wanted.
Movie theatres have a lot of unsold inventory on off times. They probably would have been willing to cut all manner of deals for those times.
However, they were never going to give you chunks of primetime unless you had a huge cudgel.
Anybody can create a business trading $5 for $6 dollars and get millions of subscribers but that doesn't make that business idea good.
As a consumer, I think I got a much better deal out of AMC crushing this particular middle-man before things got out of control.