Cannabinoids promote neuron growth and have antidepressant-like effects (2005)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
It's thus not surprising that some of the benefits of exercise on the brain are seen when cannabinoids are ingested.
See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endocannabinoid_system
Synthetic cannabinoids have so far struck out commercially as prescription drugs (eg. Rimonabant) and they have gotten a very bad reputation among recreational users. (Go to the gas station in a rural area and somebody will tell you how his cousin got something strange from China and stayed up for three days and bit his pitbull)
It would be nice to see this tested with THC, CBD and other compounds that are actually in cannabis. Pot may or may not be good for you but it won't make you have seizures and synthetic cannabinoids will.
The novel cannabinoids making headlines because they’re sending people to the emergency room, when weed is so famously safe in overdose, are dangerous (at least partly) because they bind more strongly to the CB1 receptors than THC does.
Not sure how people generally distinguish between between “synthetic” in these two senses.
I don't smoke much anymore but I ran into the same problem in my 20s, where I wouldn't smoke it ever because of paranoia/anxiety. I later learned this can be significantly tempered by finding the right strain and method of consumption.
By far the best, with the last negative side effects, I tried using CO2 shatter (in one of those disposable vape pens) recently for the first time and it was a far cleaner and more energetic experience than you find by smoking it. Vaping is definitely the way to go if you aren't just looking for a groggy 'high' and want a clear functional experience.
The other big factor is tolerance. Once you develop tolerance the anxiety and paranoia aren't nearly as strong and you simply get used to it. Then the experience is far more enjoyable.
Finally, don't consume too much. Nothing causes anxiety/paranoia than taking too much (like getting 'hammered' drunk is not a good idea).
Unlike alcohol there are a large varieties of experiences with marijuana possible, depending on how and what you smoke. It takes some experimenting and experience to find what works for you.
Vaporization for the win.
When will this confusion end and when will we get definitive answers regarding long term / short term / frequent / seldom use? So that we can get cases on who is prone to abuse, what are the signs, etc? What frequency / reason to use is okay?
It seems due already, considering the popularity of the substance among populations world-wide despite the legality status.
What's worse with Cannabis is that there is a big ideological battle going on. It's gotten political. There are people who seem to believe that Cannabis is some wonder plant that cures cancer (I'm serious). There are lots of people claiming it helps with anxiety. Me, I'm 100% pro-legalization, but whenever I've tried smoking weed (of any strain), it's made me extremely anxious and paranoid. I've even had a panic attack after smoking a joint (and I never get panic attacks!). It seems obvious to me that Cannabis doesn't have the same effect on everybody, and that it's not universally good. Just like everything else in this world, things are more nuanced. I just wish people could see past their own ideology and stop trying to push the idea that this drug is either universally good or universally bad.
TL;DR: scientists aren't always impartial. They can be bought, or motivated by political ideology. Both of these things get in the way of real science.
People usually getting panic/anxiety attacks are taking far too much and I never recommend actually smoking it for beginners, instead vaporizing it at a lower temperature.
I had the same problem being paranoid and getting panic attacks, but that was relieved by vaporizing. It's a more calm and chill high in my opinion.
However, a drug that causes anxiety in some people and relieves it in others is one that might well be used by doctors (with an appropriate level of care). Most psychoactive medicines have varying effects.
The first step is legalization so governments don't get in the way of research, ala https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17959251
A proper drug approval trial process is one of the best ways to get statistically valid results. It is also horrifically expensive--you're looking at >$100 million for a phase III trial, whether or not you succeed (this is the main reason drugs are so expensive: you're paying for phase III failures). The studies you see are generally of much poorer quality, and most people who are interested in the subject tend to have a result they are aiming for, which increases the risks of statistical fraud greatly.
Until then, it's just trying to approximate that using techniques highly sensitive to noise.
I'm not pro~ cannabis, but it seems some researchers have an agenda.
Médical research is weird.
Persistent cannabis users show neuropsychological decline from childhood to midlife (2012)
http://m.pnas.org/content/pnas/109/40/E2657.full.pdf
(dunno about the team, but the paper was edited by Michael Posner)
But no worries, there's always booze!
1. Smoke less. I had the paranoia and uncomfortable feeling problem for a long time and eventually I learned to just know when to say enough. In a group setting people tend to smoke a LOT, because some people have really high tolerance. I usually do a few puffs and then I'm good for a few hours... and then I eat some food, pass out, and sleep like the dead until morning. It is GREAT.
2. Go for strains with lower THC and higher CBD content. CBD is what produced the relaxed feeling and is in some clinically-approved drugs.
OR, don't smoke! I personally enjoy it but to each their own.
This. Seriously. Being just a little high can be really fun!
It’s so easy to just keep smoking until you’re a fucking mess, especially if you’re someone who used to smoke more. I feel like smoking all the time is very unhelpful for me, so I smoke rarely these days, and when I do I just smoke a tiiiny bit.
I think this may be a much, much more mild version of the phenomenon where opiate users who get used to a particular dose, quit for a while, relapse, use their prior dose, and die. You get a “serving size” in your head, and for those of us who have smoked quite a bit of weed in the past it’s easy to be like yeah sure I’ll go ahead and smoke this half gram joint and then I’m fucking ruined and not happy about anything.
But overall I’m with the grandparent; habitual smoking feels like a terrible habit to me and does NOT correlate with me reaching my goals. It most certainly does not help with my depression — quite the opposite.
Accept that this will take time, and you won’t feel really normal for a while, but you will feel OK again.
I meditated on the differences I felt when high and not. Getting beyond the physical sensations, which are very nice, the biggest difference was that I was able to relax my mind and enjoy things when high. When I was high, I was not eating an apple and worrying about my daily/weekly/big-picture stresses. I was just eating an apple. I already knew that this was preferable on an intellectual level, but getting high allowed me to feel it - to know that it was actually like.
The first time I quit, I had not practiced enough to enact this in my non-high state. Even though I knew I wanted it, I let my thoughts hurt me. This last time, I had practiced/meditated enough to naturally be in the state of just enjoying an apple (btw - I don't just eat apples all day). Enjoying nature, taking walks, and my interests/passions also help a lot.
I don't know if that will be helpful to you, but I hope it is :^)
I don't understand why "potsplaining" is so prevalent: whenever I indicate that I can't have marijuana, I'm told I'm being stupid, that it's all in my head and it's due to a wide sample of armchair diagnoses of a psychological state on my behalf.
Telling people that they have to, or should, smoke marijuana is on exactly the same intellectual footing as telling people that they can't - sans medical reasons on both ends of that spectrum.
Original headline: Cannabinoids promote embryonic and adult hippocampus neurogenesis and produce anxiolytic- and antidepressant-like effects
Suggested headline: Cannabinoids promote neuron growth; have anti-anxiety and antidepressant effects
The headline as submitted: Marijuana Causes Brain Cells to Grow and Happiness
My objections are the headline as submitted is un-grammatical and also simplifies inaccurately way more than necessary for this audience (and anyone who would be interested in the actual article)