This one doesn't seem to belong as I'm sure most women would be just as likely to make this assumption as men, wouldn't they? This seems like it should be on a separate "Non-TransGender Programmer Privilege Checklist".
This list and the parent article are both, in my opinion, way off base. Some people are juvenile and obnoxious and we can pick them out of a crowd by this very behavior. Turning around and telling everyone else in the room that they are just as juvenile and obnoxious is unreasonable and unfair. Part of being an open group is letting pretty much anyone who's interested into the room.
I can understand why many of these criticisms would be characterized as whining. Some of these items seem like nitpicking when compared to some of the very real injustices that women face in the workplace, for instance, the fact that they aren't paid the same wage for the same work. Better curation of this list might help ameliorate that issue.
i.e. there is not much specific about maleness or programming. Programming happens to be majority male, so it's easy to think this checklist is more specific than it really is.
1. Any majority
2. Any majority
3. Not true. Male partner does not get a free nepotism pass
4. Consider a male nurse, appreciating McSteamy.
5. Consider a technician in coveralls. Janitor?
6. Any majority
7. Reasonable. c.f. Horny
8. Any majority
9. Reasonable. c.f. Pilates / Yoga
10. Reasonable. Assholes exist
11. Reasonable. c.f. Pilates / Yoga
12. Asinine.
13. Context? c.f. Pilates / Yoga
14. Asinine. Only distracts females? Products and systems are
anthropomorphized female as well.
15. Asinine. I've witnessed open door talks.
16. Completely asinine. How on earth could one possibly sleep one's way
into a bug fix? Assholes exist.
17. There exist male programmers who are not appreciated for their
professional competence. There exist male employees who are
appreciated for their dispute resolution skills.
18. Completely asinine. More context needed.
19. Asinine. Computer programmers are unattractive dorks who live in
their parents' basement.
20. Any majority.
21. Unfounded.
22. Reasonable. c.f. Sex and the City
23. Unfounded. c.f. skateboarding
24. Unfounded. c.f. Porcelain dolls
25. Unfounded. it happens both ways
26. Asinine. We all have to Dress For Work.
27. Unfounded. e.g. DHH [citation needed, but it can't be too hard to find]
28. Straw man. Not the same as LOLcats. False dichotomy regarding
colleague perspective. Did anyone really laugh at this?
29. Reasonable, but is there any evidence any attendee saw another attendee
primarily as a sex object?
30. Any majority. c.f. male nurse
31. Completely unfounded.
32. Reasonable. c.f. Joe Sixpack
33. Reasonable. c.f. Forums / 4chan
34. Unfounded. Why are males exempt from this discomfort?
35. Unfounded. Males are not exempt from this worry.
36. Asinine. Everyone without a chip on her shoulder has this freedom.
37. Straw man. *Pure* meritocracy, really?
38. Completely unfounded. Males are in no way exempt from death threats.
e.g. crypto / security researchers
39. Dubious. Let's see the responses to this very comment ;)
40. Dubious. c.f. the privilege to promote the privilege of the male
programmer
As a numbered wall o' text, it looks formidable, but a lot of these items are mere rephrasing or restatements of the same complaint (valid or not). I must admit this list is thought provoking, and it is good to enumerate these sorts of things.However, there are some extremely weak claims here, and their very presence undermines the overall effort. I was interested to know just how privileged I was, but after scanning a few of these, it's hard to take the author seriously.