The use of "blacklist" is offensive
github.com
github.com
These misguided attempts to control people's speech do not resolve anyones struggles in any meaningful way and if anything only introduces political fatigue for your cause.
I don't mean to make fun or provoke, but I think we sometimes go too far when it comes to PC etc.
Maybe some things should be made fun of. Like pretending you are deeply injured by a word "whitelist". Otherwise we'll find ourselves in a world... well, the one we're finding ourselves in now.
Same goes for "blacklist/whitelist". i'm not sure this ever referred to skin color...
There are certain people that enjoy the feeling of righteous indignation at finding "offenses" and "calling out" other people on them. This allows them to feel morally superior and as if they contribute something to the society. So instead of writing code or positively contribute in some other ways, they play the Red Guard and police other's speech. I've read several articles of people coming off this dangerous drug and realizing, post-factum, that this was exactly what and exactly why they were doing it, but too many people are still doing it anyway.
> i'm not sure this ever referred to skin color...
It never did. The Red Guards don't care.
If you have a chat with a racist they'll also tell you that black people are bad and white people are good.
I'm no expert but language shapes how we interact and perceive the world.
It's like cultures that have different sets of words to describe different shades of colours. I remember reading how this gives people in general more or less of an ability to differenciate shades.
The jury is still out on that one, because language relativity is still a hypothesis, not a theory.
I personally don't believe it.
And you can't even comment on it without giving this explanation first because people will assume that you're racist if you don't do this first.
This makes me sad since we have so much do to and we can achieve a lot yet we're focusing these so-called problems.
I assumed master/slave was adopted from the idea of a master record. The main thing that came to mind is audio mastering, not people. Am I missing something about the origin?
It's nice to see changes that make things more clear, however I wish political correctness was not a factor.
Are orphan processes and brainfuck next?
When i think master/slave i think SPI master/slave, where the slaves only do as told by the master. In which case the primary/replica relationship would not be suitable, while the master/slave relationship is descriptive of what actually goes on.
If we have one (in my view unoffensive, but that might be a cultural thing) term which adequately describes the relationship - why not use it?
[1] https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3185
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/search?q=master+slave&unsc...
[3] https://github.com/apple/darwin-xnu/search?q=master+slave&un...
Enjoy!
I imagine "Black Magic" probably originated from a term describing African traditions and cultures.
So there was more exposure to different races that what's conventionally thought by people in the time periods.
Like a across the Mediterranean from Greece and Italy is Africa.
Conquering Northern Africa have been a goal for centuries before that.
Also the middle East has also been a goal to capture.
So for millennia in Europe the idea of conquering the lands of darker skinned people has been a thing.
And the 'black magic' traditions of the middle ages almost certainly drew their inspiration from the rituals of the Hellenistic mystery cults and related groups rather than any African tradition or cultures.
All the being said, I'm straying quite far out of my area of expertise here, so I'm certainly open to be proven wrong.