Valve new-employee handbook (2012) [pdf]
steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net
steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net
https://twitter.com/richgel999/status/1018729819243143173
PS: And yeah I strongly recommend to read whole post history since he's really smart guy.
This was back in 2012, when it actually looked like they innovated. Now it seems like their directionless. They still patch their old games adding one-off features, but I don't know if I've really seen a roadmap from them in a long time.
I could be completely wrong though, they aren't exactly a talkative company.
The only behind the scenes thing I've seen is a lot of work on VR, such as pressure sensitive controllers that translate your grip strength into effects in game, like crushing a small rock if you squeeze the controller hard enough.
> How does Valve decide what to work on?
> The same way we make other decisions: by waiting for someone to decide that it’s the right thing to do, and then letting them recruit other people to work on it with them.
Is this why Valve hasn't released anything but mediocre hardware and steam updates? Where's the vision? What are they actually trying to do as a company? Are they just a place where people come and go and do whatever they want?
Don't get me wrong, I do most of my gaming through Steam. But I don't play Valve games. And I sometimes chat on steam, but mostly Discord. And my favorite games, Factorio and Rimworld, can all be purchased independently (minus Steam's cut I might add!). With cloud computing in full swing, indie developers don't need a store to distribute with.
If the total flexibility is theoretically there but in practice it isn't, I can imagine you'd end up with a lot of people self-suppressing so they don't break the unofficial rules.
At the time, the company had no structured way of determining your work performance so it was all based on people's opinion. If your manager thinks you're amazing and tells others, then that information gets passed up amongst the ranks. Social value (popularity) meant more for your career than actually doing good work.
A former coworker once saw my email inbox and commented that I had a lot of unread emails (over 3000). A few weeks later, I got brought into an office by my manager where he kept stating how vital it was that emails need to be read. I do read emails -- I just don't read Github notification emails.
Any office culture that revolves around rumors and reputations will likely be a dysfunctional one.
> Steam controller/Steam Link
Huge flop. These are being practically given away now as Valve looks to get rid of their excess inventory. This being hardware, it had to be an expensive venture that failed to penetrate the living room.
> Steam machines
Another stinker, though Valve was able to successfully offload most of the risk onto OEMs with this one. Opportunity cost still bites.
> VR
I commend Valve for putting all their chips in on this, but it looks like the VR industry had yet another cold start. This will go down as an almost total loss.
All the while Valve has been neglecting game development which, while admittedly much more expensive and less rewarding than running a sales platform, ensures that there's a sufficient amount of first party titles to keep users on Steam.
With the advent of Fortnite and competing platforms from other triple-A studios, it's not so farfetched to imagine a complete fracturing of the games platform market over the next 5-10 years. Valve needs a return-to-roots moment to prevent this from happening
And they are releasing a DOTA 2 card game this year?
Steam machines weren't expensive either, OEM PC costs are nothing compared to a "real" console rollout, with custom hardware contracts, permanent production lines and a whole advertising campaign.
Totally agree! I bought a steam controller and it gathers dust. They didn't pair the release of the controller with a killer game, there's nothing pushing me to use this over my mouse and keyboard. My friend has a steam link and it needs a lot of polish, some games don't work and it crashes a lot.
> VR
Another flop because of no killer game. A couple indie studios put out some quick hacks you might call video games, but other than that.. yeah total flop. I do see VR booths at places new age arcades like Dave & Busters, but I doubt there's enough of them to prop up the whole industry.
Fortnite is one more nail in the coffin for them. Video games are a zero sum game - I can only play one game at a time and there are only so many hours in the day for me to play. If I'm playing Fortnite, then I'm not playing Dota 2.
Was the steam link really a huge flop? That's sad, I absolutely love mine. It's probably one of the best purchases I've ever made cost-to-value wise.
I did, but they stopped putting them out.
That would definitely be a reason that they haven't put anything out - valve feels super weird in that it seems like the whole company is in maintenance mode and enjoying being the biggest guy on the video game distribution block.
And I guess that's not completely fair - I'm sure they keep making hats for TF2.
"Facing competition" as in they are now taking in only 90% of the revenue as opposed to 100%? That's just healthy.
> Is this why Valve hasn't released anything but mediocre hardware and steam updates?
Valve is still supporting and updating successful titles like TF2, DOTA2 and CS:GO.
>Where's the vision? What are they actually trying to do as a company? Are they just a place where people come and go and do whatever they want?
If you read the handbook, the idea is that you allocate yourself to what you perceive to be the most valuable thing for the company. It's supposed to be self-organizing, just like the economy in the real word, which doesn't have a "vision" either.
The thing with games studios is that a lot of projects get canned (preferably early) before anybody ever hears about it. It's the same for Valve. They're not actually that big. Other publishers have dozens of studios working for them, going in and out of business all the time. Nobody really pays attention to that, but when the guys at Valve don't release anything for years, people notice.
> Don't get me wrong, I do most of my gaming through Steam. But I don't play Valve games. And I sometimes chat on steam, but mostly Discord. And my favorite games, Factorio and Rimworld, can all be purchased independently (minus Steam's cut I might add!). With cloud computing in full swing, indie developers don't need a store to distribute with.
Discord is irrelevant to Valve's business, that's not where the money comes from. Valve is a store front, no indie can afford to just self-publish on PC without being on Steam. Factorio and Rimworld got popular through Steam.
Wrong, that is a loss of 10% market share. In other markets, a drop like that would put you out of business. Valve isn't dead, they're just a bit ill and if they don't go to the doctor and get their head checked, it will kill them.
> It's supposed to be self-organizing, just like the economy in the real word, which doesn't have a "vision" either.
This only works because billions of people participate in the economy. At that scale, it's mathematically probable that someone will do something great. Valve is too small for this to work, they need focus and vision.
> Factorio and Rimworld got popular through Steam.
False. Both of these games reached popularity before they were on steam.
Valve's moat is eroding. Between these games, Fortnite, and other mobile entrants, they are slipping.
90% of what though? The big publishers are moving away from Steam presumably because the terms are crap and indies now have many more options.
> Discord is irrelevant to Valve's business, that's not where the money comes from. Valve is a store front, no indie can afford to just self-publish on PC without being on Steam. Factorio and Rimworld got popular through Steam.
Discord announced a storefront last month, they're absolutely a competitor. The obvious counterpoint to indies needing to be on Steam is League of Legends, though I'll also point out that I bought Rimworld well before it was on steam. Most indie circles talk about the tradeoff today for steam being pretty bad - you give 30% for almost nothing, and still have to do a ton of marketing because market saturation means just being on steam isn't enough. If you're already doing the marketing yourself, the storefront is much less of a factor.
https://www.reddit.com/r/valve/comments/8zmp07/former_valve_...