I feel if anything the US education system exposes to more children than the European systems, even though I feel the system is misguided.
In any case, I had calculus in highschool, then more of it in University and I still feel I could do with a fun refresher every now and then.
What do you mean?
In the NL often these tracks are even in separate schools, but always separate classes. So my sister went to a different highschool than I did because I was showing more proclivity towards scientific education. After her highschool if she wanted she still could've opted for a track that would qualify her for scientific education, but since she had a preference for arts she went to an arts academy instead.
update: combining www.onderwijsdoelen.be and the distribution of students across the different tracks, 69% of the students are required to be exposed to this.
The primary difference between US and European education is in the US taking particular courses of study is the decision of the student/parents and not of the state.
I feel that typical pre-college curriculums cover topics superficially-- just enough for the exams. Many students would benefit so much more if they held-off on calculus until they became fluent in "the basics". Instead you get students practically forced to take calculus in high school whether they're ready or not and then they need to repeat the material in college-- sometimes STILL under-prepared.
For college-bound, it would be much better to slow down, focus on rigor and mastery of algebra, geometry, practical applications, and proofs. Then in college start with something much deeper and more comprehensive than your typical "Calc 101"-- maybe at the level of Spivak's Calculus text or Rudin's.