Nasa launches $1M competition to turn Mars CO2 into sugar
newsweek.com
newsweek.com
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_Shredder_Challenge_2011
https://www.businessinsider.com/heres-what-really-happened-a...
which was thought to be almost impossible to solve.
> DARPA, The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, created 5 coded-documents of increasing complexity, ran them through an industrial paper-shredder, scanned the pieces, and posted them online for anyone to attempt to solve. Each document had a certain amount of 'intel', every piece of which was given a point value. The competition, which launched October 27 and would expire December 4, was offering a prize of $50,000 to the first individual or team to find all the intel (first to 50 points).
> The competition gained popularity quickly, with over 9000 official entrants and 50,000 folks downloading the first of the five puzzles. But skeptics had already begun to question the contest after only 67 entrants could score any points at all. "Lots of experts were skeptical that a solution could be produced at all, let alone within the short time frame," said Dan Kaufman, director, DARPA Information Innovation Office. But, with just 2 days remaining before the competition was closed (only 33 days after it began) one of the entrants had solved all 5 levels completely.
Most plants need some oxygen for the root network, but photosynthesis produces an excess of oxygen and doesn't require it to run.
Hmm, I wonder if there's a market for that...
It's literally dirt cheap and super easy in many parts of the world to drop sugar beets in the ground at 40 acres an hour. Photovoltaics (not even considering the chemistry equipment) to cover an hour's worth of planting will cost on the order of $20 million!
1. Individuals (hobbyists) who will work for free in hopes of winning.
2. Well-funded academics and industry R&D who will bill their costs against their employers, who hope to profit from the publicity generated by the public contest.
mars also has lots of interesting isotopes, which I guess helps the equation
Long term studies in the current space station seem to suggest that humans can't live years at zero G without serious health problems developing. It would useful to try out Mars gravity (38% of Earth's) somewhat closer to Earth than the surface of Mars.
The smart money on useful compounds is CO and O2, made possible with high temperatures, CO2, and not much else.
And yes, you do need water for plants, but you're probably going to need hydrogen from somewhere anyway. Mars does have a decent amount of water ice ripe for melting.
https://www.ft.com/content/34859346-b023-11e7-8076-0a4bdda92...