Sure, you need external cues to synchronise / entrain it, but the body does keep its own time. As do animals, plants, insects..
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circadian_rhythm
[2] https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/foundat...
Sure, you need external cues to synchronise / entrain it, but the body does keep its own time. As do animals, plants, insects..
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circadian_rhythm
[2] https://www.google.co.in/amp/s/www.the-scientist.com/foundat...
Even if making a stronger claim not focused on the brain specifically, plants especially need light for like everything.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Jacques_d%27Ortous_de_Mai...
More work since then extends this idea. Pubmed has a ton of good papers.
And for the 1930s exp you posted, i suppose its just the energy reserves of whichever crucial part for the older were either fine tuned or not extendable, whereas a 20 year old (risk inclined) college student can still pull allnighters twice a weak and other endurance exercises. Physical fitness peaks before the 30s. And a prof is someone working with the mind so the experiment itself without intense physical strain is taxing enough. They self tested, that alone is probably a huge warningsign.
But i was mainly refering to plants that can be brought to flower by light cycle manipulation. Now I kind of wonder how mimosa reacts circadian anyway ... and I guess it's due to relative changes in the air humidity.