Mint.com Pre-Launch Pitch Deck
slideshare.net
slideshare.net
It's a funny story but we won the competition with this presentation, in part because Shasta Ventures, one of the judges there, happened to actually be funding the company (which they announced 3 days after we pitched it). For the questions regarding the financials, I don't know how closely they match reality but we were told by the judges that we won in part because the numbers were conservative/realistic and were in the same ballpark as their own figures.
The slide lists http://www.emetrics.org/articles/acquisition.shtml as the source, but it is 404'd.
Old data.
Also I know that this wasn't the real deck, but there was too much emphasis on patents and I have never seen a valuation/expected return in a deck.
Good research because it ended up being right, but I suspect that Mint revenue was a lot more than $4M and they spent a lot more than what this research implies.
http://techcrunch.com/2009/10/08/startups-101-the-complete-m...
Interesting how the slides from the 2006/2007 deck are so much less polished and high-value, design-wise, than the 2008 deck they're presented in.
Pre-launch? Really?