A spreadsheet of the businesses I've started over the past 15 years
twitter.com
twitter.com
I've got a giant list of ideas (99.9% horrible) i've kept over the years. they always seem exciting when I'm writing them down ..but a week later they seem laughable. I always find myself thinking, despite realizing the idea is horrible - that I should have created a 2 or 3 page website as a business-like pre-mvp on the concept while I was still excited about it.
You have to start somewhere and try things out to find a business bringing revenue. And yes, it is "spray and pray" in essence. And I see nothing wrong with it. (probably because I tried to launch a similar number if not more of such "businesses"/projects and continue doing so)
Predicting which software businesses will find this fit is extremely hard. VCs know this, and diversify their investments among many founders (knowing one big payday can make up for 10-100 failures).
Looks like this founder diversified by himself and launched small things faster. And eventually found something worth "marrying".
Often a business is about the team, not the concept. Given any talented team, they an take any concept and evolve it to fit the market.
Also, there's no way he was able to take any of those concepts far enough given the numbers and time frame.
It can often take a small team several months to a couple of years to find out if it's going to really work or not.
Bach wrote almost a piece every day. For most of his life. Most of it will never be played or heard.
The thing that's most common among the 'greats' is how prolific they were. They just kept doing. Just watching Jim Henson. Bio - he was doing Kermite for like 20 years before it remotely caught on. I worked at BlackBerry - the company started in 1982, about 20 years before the BB wars born. The other CEO started in 1992 about 10 years. So 30 man-years of combined CEO work before the BB came to be a product.
I’ve come to view great teams as “necessary but not sufficient”. That is: without a great team you will fail, but even with one you still need to build something a market will pay for.
If an objectively great team was all you needed, venture investors wouldn’t be satisfied with the dismal likelihood of getting returns on startup money (compared to other forms of investing).
Re: giving concepts time—fair point, but I think you also have to consider your own time as an investment. Sure a failing project could work with 2y more effort, but is it worth two years of your life to find out if it hasn’t already worked? What if you spent that time on giving another idea a chance?
Try 100 things while avoiding common pitfalls. One of them will probably pan out.
The people you meet along the way ("marriages") often carry forward into future projects.
This is what the long haul looks like.
- Coach Kamogawa thru George Morikawa
I wasn't working hard when I bought Bitcoin at three bucks a coin. I was just intellectually curious. If anything when I was working hard was two years before that on a soon to be failed startup. We crawled the web for ads just before the ad business went hyper targeted. I made -$20k from working hard.
I made a lot more from Bitcoin. I would have made way more if I'd put that $20k in Bitcoin and slacked off at some day job.
I guess I don't really follow my own advice though, as I'm presently working on a Sunday morning and I've only taken like two days off this month.
Edit:
Writing this comment briefly made me re-consider my whole life and I've come to the conclusion that being lucky and prescient observations are more likely if you've worked hard at some point. I did do an engineering degree with some economics electives at the best school in Canada, and understanding Satoshi's paper wouldn't have been possible without this background knowledge.
After writing the above, I Googled Linus. Apparently he's worth over $100m.
But you're right. Plenty of really successful poets or athletes are poor.
If only I hadn't been relatively broke when I bought in. I was suffering burn-out and basically working odd contracts here and there to keep the lights on.
The problem is that, by definition, most people are in a pyramid scheme at the bottom.
In general, there are lots of activities which give the appearance of hard work but are actually fairly superficial and detrimental to your long-term goals.
Not at all saying that's the case here, more just musing on the idea of grinding for the sake of grinding.
I think there's an assumption that the most successful people both work smart AND hard, which is likely true to some degree - e.g. successful pro athletes have staff that likely conduct well-targeted and thoughtful practices, but the hours and effort involved are still quite intense.
I more-so think the problem is that "working smart" requires a lot of careful planning and forethought, and is quite ambiguous in most cases what it actually means - and in many cases just happens serendipitously. Because of that, the process isn't as obvious.
It's much easier (intellectually, at least) to emulate the "working hard" part and to a large degree it's the one we reward the most societally (even in more intellectual circles), so it's not surprising that it's the one that people assume is the most necessary component of being successful - and that the "working smart" part will either come naturally, or after success is had.
If you're some random person with no access to capital or social connections then your focus should be luck.
As a random person who started with no social connections and no capital, I think about luck all the time and it helps me to make decisions. Mostly, it helps me to weigh up future opportunities against current opportunities - I think about things that happened to me and I ask myself how unlikely they were to occur; if they were very unlikely, I try to stay on that unlikely path. Never waste your luck; you have to keep moving forward wherever it takes you. Sometimes it leads you to places you don't want to be, but beggars can't be choosers.
While there are of course people who have been extremely successful relying on those two things alone (and they dominate the headlines, of course), there are countless successful people who succeeded without either of those two things.
It's pretty disingenuous, for example, to argue that Katherine Johnson's (admittedly delayed in recognition) success is the result of social connections or acting skills.
An even more trivial example is that many pro athletes (in the US, at least) didn't achieve success because of their social connections to capital; most of them certainly aren't great actors either.
I also wasted too much time on stupid shit I never even launched. Like 1yr on a flash game of my dog (never launched). Another year on a site for musicians that never had a name or domain. A year on a bike rental directory. Another on a CMS for mobile sites (yeah m.domain sites, my timing sucked). A year or more on a trello-like project management app that sucked but launched with 100 beta users.
I also did 10-20 launch pages for testing marketable ideas. Most didnt work, and a few that did I didnt want to do (stuff like automated browser testing).
All that before hitting a product I've spent the last 4 years taking to six figures. So yeah, results vary. But I love this list. Brings back my good memories of wondering when I'd make more then 5 bucks on something that wasn't freelancing.
You just did ;)
Right here:
> My "big break" product was actually from a mentor who needed the prduct. Had nothing to do with me hunting it down.
That's one of the great secrets to success right there, build something that you already know someone needs. Considerably reduces the role of the luck factor and guess-work.
Bottom line, can we prove that this won't be a waste of time?
This is why I don't open the text editor and start new stuff that I come up with now days. I'm too traumatized from all the lessons I've learned to do that. Getting above water is the biggest hurtle. After that you realize that you don't need to touch anything that risks going nowhere.
I think this is a completely different mindset compared to engineers/"nerds", that's why most of us work for others instead of starting our own businesses.
Wasn’t worth the time to try to sell them.
If you are a nerd who wants to break into entrepreneurship, prepare for a lot of fun, but also prepare to do work you think is stupid or never saw yourself doing, only for it to end up as a niche product. That's fine.
That's the main reason why I work for others. You can't form a health system startup that includes dozens of hospitals and thousands of patients per day.
A year into struggling as an entrepreneur and no longer working at BigCo - I couldn't be happier despite having to live with a crazy amount of anxiety :)
One quote that has stuck in my mind is from Chuck Jones, quoting his own prof at RISD: "You have 10,000 bad paintings in you. The sooner you get them out the sooner you'll get to the good ones."
I eventually learned to just let that dumb idea (weld, program, drawing) get out. Some good ideas fail, and most bad ideas fail, but sometimes you can only tell which it was (good or bad) after the fact.
And kudos again. Great list.
For some of us the glory is not in the exit but rather in the building.
Regardless, this gives me hope because he has made money from several of them!
There are definitely businesses in there that I regret moving on from too soon but you live and learn. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Also, great list! Did some of those affiliate sites make money even though you eventually shut them down and didn't sell them?
It's less an issue now, but 10+ years ago, there were a lot of CPAs who didn't have much/any experience with internet-based businesses and so they weren't familiar with some of the additional bits to take in to account.
As for affiliate sites...I probably made a grand total of 50 cents from them...total. :P
Where did you find your buyers?
Why is it called Cedar & Sail when (as far as I can tell) it has nothing to do with either of those things? :p
In any case, congrats on hitting it big with Baremetrics!
Then 'File', 'Make a copy' and you can edit and resize as desired.