There's no realistic way to combat the heavy lobbying that's going on around intellectual property questions, copyright in particular. Thus, to make reality and laws match, enforcement must be adjusted instead.
I'm not sure I see the reason reality and laws must be made to match. I don't see that as something that is inherently all that valuable (if at all), and certainly not to the degree that it's worth doing whatever is easiest regardless of costs to make it happen.
You say you "don't see the problem" because you see no way to fix things. The problem does not cease to be a problem because of that.
I've made a clarifying edit. Maybe this helps capture what I'm trying to say.