Usable version of RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1)

Look nice but:

- Needs to have a search (that lists sections found, lets you skip between finds, etc.)

- Needs index, even though tabs are nice

- scrollbar in middle of page != friendly (use vertical space in page and page scroll)

Why is this version more useable than the already available versions?

I prefer the text version myself. I can use it in more places than this HTML version.

I think this version much more usable: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616

To debug my wiki engine, I did some experiment with RFCs.

RFCs as wikis: http://simpliwiki.com/yours/SomeRfcs

This is an other definition of "usable" I guess.

I added an orange visual cue when scrolling, to make it easier to spot where new content starts.

Don't really get the point. Is the idea to get it up in the Google rankings and then add ads?

Have a look at the html source... some http://www.intelli-computing.com/wordpress/?super_sale=DDDD code in there...

Great idea. Weak implementation. Compared to even the TXT version that's my top Google hit for [rfc2616], this is harder to search and fits less text into the same sized viewport. (Devoting ~40% of the viewport to informationless deepCyan background isn't very helpful.)

this is offensively not usable. just as an example, I can't grep the whole document now. I think this is the wrong target market for fake usability.