The Android Market
tomkleinpeter.com
tomkleinpeter.com
Hopefully, as they continue to improve the OS, they will improve the Marketplace as well.
(Side: I am still waiting to even hear another thing about the Desktop version that was demoed at the Google IO this year.)
...uh, really? There are many very concrete reasons to believe they know about the vast majority of these issues and have respective solutions addressing them somewhere in their product roadmap. (ie, major UI revision in Gingerbread, along with optimization for tablets.) That, and they've been overwhelmingly successful so far, as Android phones now consistently outsell the iPhone each quarter.
The improvements really are constantly coming.
You consider it an improvement, I consider it a late partial fix of what should've been there from the start.
I don't think the size of the team is a defense against the OP's critique. Criticism of Google's handling of the Android market includes the decision about how much man-power to devote to it.
This isn't a personal attack on the team members.
The situation is different with Android. Building a better app marketplace than the Android market is not exactly a very high bar to leap.
- ability to publish what changed in an update
- track number of users who upgraded vs new users
- ability to search for apps and see reviews on http://www.android.com/market/ (that website is practically useless)
They showed their cloud syncing online store at Google IO. Watch, starting around 31:10 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY3U2GXhz44
The whole video is very much worth watching for any developers.
Historically, when search was really their sole product, it was annoying but tolerable. Unhappy with them? Use a different search engine.
The bar moves, IMO, when you start asking people to invest (time or money) in your product. Dynamic is exactly the same with Google Apps "Enterprise" edition. When people are paying you hundreds or thousands of dollars a year, many have a reasonable expectation that the company will let them know when certain critical bugs/performance issues are going to be fixed.
Although they've improved a little, for the most part they continue to suck at this. It doesn't seem to be in their DNA.
This was all discussed at Google IO when they announced JIT/Froyo. How can you say Google hasn't indicated there is a problem? I guess they're just planning a complete revamp/redo of the market for giggles?
If they discussed these at Google IO, that's irrelevant: they should just deliver, everything else matters less.
Another annoyance the article hasn't mentioned: my European country is not on their frickin' list (not even with the latest update) and I cannot upload priced apps, even though I can do that in Apple's iTunes store. I mean, WTF ?!?
I agree, but I still don't agree with this...
> There has been no indication from Google that they think anything is wrong with the market or that they're planning to fix it.
Gingerbread = Android 3.0, coming by the end of the year.
Honeycomb = Android 3.5, coming next year, with further optimizations for tablets.