I like when "following standard practice, literally listed in the bug report and used 100's of times" is suddenly "counter-pr efforts"
type: vulnerability is new, but if you search the public bug tracker for the phrase "This bug is subject to a 90-day disclosure deadline", you can see it all
It looks like they have been pretty darn consistent about unrestricting once the patch is available. Usually faster than 7 days!
They have also consistently held people to the 90 day requirement, and the 14 day grace extension they offer This is true even when the reporter is a googler or it affects only google software.
This literally took me 5 minutes to look at and analyze.
Instead of bothering to even look, epic decided it'd be better to issue a press release (as part of their pr efforts, ironically enough).
If they want to complain (like others have!) and debate what the policy should be, that is one thing.
However, the complaint that Google has treated them differently is clearly false.
If they want to argue otherwise, the data is all right there for them to use.