Russian Trolls Used Vaccine Debate to Sow Discord, Study Find
nytimes.com
nytimes.com
And its working very well as a propaganda point too - now, any time someone questions the powers that be and the way they operate, well .. obviously that person is a Russian troll.
The irony in how quickly Americans seem to have picked up this authoritarian control mechanism (propaganda==truth) seems to have been lost on a lot of people. Do they still teach Orwell in schools in America?
Crimea (part of Ukraine) was "liberated" by "little green men"[0] and then coincidently decided to join Russian federation.
There is no secret that Russian government sponsors internet trolls to push it's agenda [1]
I agree that someone might abuse "Russian troll" card but keep in mind that Russian (government) is no saint here. Russians themselves are fine though. And please don't start with "but Americans also do this and that". Im saying here that Russian trolls are real. One use twitter, other use military uniforms without insignia. Depending on situation ;)
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_green_men_(Ukrainian_cr... [1] https://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2018/03/15/594062887/...
Not propaganda, which is what your links are really.
Real evidence. Something tangible, which leads to the conclusions being promoted by the propaganda. I'm yet to see any. Like, there is literally ZERO evidence preferred, every single time.
They only need to manipulate the metadata. The CIA admitted that they do this as well in Vault 7.
As such, any claims by journalists with arts degrees that they somehow know definitively what is happening in the cyberspace are fake.
If you want an in-depth examination of Russian trolls this document about Latvia is useful.
https://www.stratcomcoe.org/internet-trolling-hybrid-warfare...
Or you can read this: https://euvsdisinfo.eu/disinfo-review/
These accounts are either from Russian state media, or linked to the Kremlin.
The same account being both pro and anti vaccines would be a definite proof in that case, I have no doubt that propaganda has no problem being spread by actual people, however in that case we would need to read the full study to be sure.
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/now-available-more...
A lot of what gets reported as "Russian trolls" is based on the data from this site ...
https://dashboard.securingdemocracy.org/
which monitors 600 twitter accounts that link content "relevant to Russian messaging themes." You can read more about their methodology here ...
https://securingdemocracy.gmfus.org/the-methodology-of-the-h...
[1] http://media1.s-nbcnews.com/i/today/z_creative/WeaponizedHea...
>“Don’t get #vaccines. Illuminati are behind it.”
is actually given any credibility and can actually contribute to form or shift an opinion, there is then IMHO an underlying (bigger) problem with the gullibility of the people.
If there were either hundreds or at least several tens of thousands tweets like that, or if all of the tweets they've screened were highly popular, then I could take that study seriously. As it is, however, this appears to be a targeted evaluation failing to qualify the significance of those tweets' impact.
[0]: https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2018....