Google finds evidence of attack linked to Iran state media
axios.com
axios.com
Mark my words, this new push by social media to take down "inauthentic" pages is really being used to crush dissent and alternate opinions that go against the grain of the allowed discourse in USA.
If China can do it, so can USA. This seems oddly familiar to the run up to Iraq.
[1] https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/08/more-coordinated-inauth...
[2] https://www.salon.com/2016/10/11/leaked-hillary-clinton-emai...
There is an endless supply of deeply offensive content on fb that’s not taken down. Including anti-Israel/Pro-Palestine.
If you believe the official announcement, this content was taken down not because some people disagree with it, but because it’s “inauthentic”.
https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-research/2018/08/suspect...
>This operation is leveraging a network of inauthentic news sites and clusters of associated accounts across multiple social media platforms to promote political narratives in line with Iranian interests. These narratives include anti-Saudi, anti-Israeli, and pro-Palestinian themes, as well as support for specific U.S. policies favorable to Iran, such as the U.S.-Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA).
It seems the word 'inauthentic' is being used as an alternative to 'dissenting'.